linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Small O_SYNC writes are no longer NFS_DATA_SYNC
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:12:14 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110318131214.0e2c840a@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1300412966.9671.9.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>

On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 21:49:26 -0400 Trond Myklebust
<Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> wrote:

> However we could adopt the Solaris convention of always starting
> writebacks with a FILE_SYNC, and then falling back to UNSTABLE for the
> second rpc call and all subsequent calls...
> 

That approach certainly has merit.

However, as we know from the wbc info whether the write is small and sync -
which is the only case where I think a STABLE write is needed - I cannot see
why you don't want to just use that information to guide the choice of
'stable' or not ???

NeilBrown


  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-18  2:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-16  6:15 Small O_SYNC writes are no longer NFS_DATA_SYNC NeilBrown
2011-02-16 13:11 ` Jeff Layton
2011-02-16 20:26   ` NeilBrown
2011-02-16 20:50     ` Jeff Layton
2011-02-16 21:00       ` NeilBrown
2011-03-17 23:53 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-03-18  1:04   ` NeilBrown
2011-03-18  1:49     ` Trond Myklebust
2011-03-18  2:12       ` NeilBrown [this message]
2011-03-18  2:25         ` Trond Myklebust
2011-03-18  3:52           ` NeilBrown
2011-03-21 21:02             ` Trond Myklebust
2011-03-21 22:17               ` NeilBrown
2011-03-21 22:54                 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-03-21 23:47                   ` NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110318131214.0e2c840a@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).