From: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
To: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mount.nfs libmount support (v3)
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 09:21:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110322082123.GA30453@nb.net.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D87A12A.60209@RedHat.com>
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 03:04:10PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
> On 03/14/2011 09:58 AM, Karel Zak wrote:
> > This is the third version of the mount.nfs with libmount support. The code
> > depends on util-linux >= v2.19 (e.g. Fedora 15).
> >
> > v3:
> > - call umount_error() on mount(2) error
> >
> > v2:
> > - move nfs_umount_do_umnt() to network.c
> > - use union nfs_sockaddr
> > - add missing GPL address paragraph
> > - use abstract function the storing and retrieval mount options
> > - use "static const" for struct option
> > - use "strncmp() == 0" everywhere
> >
> >
> Looking at unmounting a non-existent fs I get:
>
> # umount.nfs /mnt/home
> umount.nfs: remote share not in 'host:dir' format
> umount.nfs: /mnt/home: not mounted
hmm..
> The message is being generated because nfs_umount23() is
> is passed an invalid devname ('/mnt/home' in my case).
> The reason the message was not being generated before
> is because nfs_umount23() was not called when the devname
> did not exist in the mtab.
right
> I also notice that the libmount code does indeed know the devname
> is not in the mtab. The lookup_umount_fs() call fails which is in
> the mnt_context_prepare_umount() call... But, rightly so, you continue
> to process the umount. Plus the umount(2) is done during the
> mnt_context_do_umount() call which ends up generating the correct
> "not mounted" message.
>
> So my question is, is there some why I can tell, using the libmount
> API, that the fs was not in either /proc/mounts or /etc/mtab?
That's simple, entries from mtab or /proc have always defined some
mount options (at least rw/ro). This heuristic is already used in
umount_main()
if (!mnt_context_is_lazy(cxt)) {
if (opts) {
....
} else
/* strange, no entry in mtab or /proc not mounted */
nfs_umount23(spec, "tcp,v3");
}
If I good understand the 'else nfs_umount23(spec, "tcp,v3")' should be
removed from the code. If I remove this line, then:
# umount.nfs /mnt/home
umount.nfs: /mnt/home: not found
There is also mnt_fs_is_kernel() to check that the FS description is
from /proc, maybe I can also add mnt_fs_is_mtab() to the API.
> Basically I do not want to call nfs_umount23() but I do want
> to call mnt_context_do_umount() when the file system is not
> in the mtab, similar to how it worked in the previous code.
Yep, the "umount.nfs server://foo" should be evaluated and converted
to the valid FS description by libmount (mnt_context_prepare_umount),
any other fallback solution is unnecessary.
It seems we need v4 of the patch...
Thanks for review!
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-22 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-14 13:58 mount.nfs libmount support (v3) Karel Zak
2011-03-14 13:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] mount: move generic functions to utils.c and network.c Karel Zak
2011-03-14 13:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] mount: add --enable-libmount-mount Karel Zak
2011-03-21 19:04 ` mount.nfs libmount support (v3) Steve Dickson
2011-03-22 8:21 ` Karel Zak [this message]
2011-04-06 17:03 ` Steve Dickson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110322082123.GA30453@nb.net.home \
--to=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=SteveD@redhat.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).