From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: NFS <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/17] CLNT: test resues slot ID
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:48:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110322214839.GA17784@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D886F71.8050001@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 05:44:17PM +0800, Mi Jinlong wrote:
> I have made a mistake about this case, we don't need the filehandle from GETFHres,
> that is just unnecessary.
>
> Thanks for your point about the homedir,
> I found a function named use_obj at nfs4lib which can solve our problem.
>
> After fixed, maybe the following patch is OK now.
Great, thanks--applied.
At this point I've applied and pushed out everything I've taken from
you.
So let me know what else you still have that's not in my git repo. I
know there are the reclaim_complete tests that you're still looking
at, but there might also be a few other odd tests that I still had
questions about?
--b.
>
> ---
> thanks,
> Mi Jinlong
>
> >From e9faf0c2e86421012296f95ce5cd9cd3338f98a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2011 19:25:23 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] CLNT: test resues slot ID
>
> Signed-off-by: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> nfs4.1/server41tests/st_sequence.py | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/nfs4.1/server41tests/st_sequence.py b/nfs4.1/server41tests/st_sequence.py
> index c11fdc9..7277290 100644
> --- a/nfs4.1/server41tests/st_sequence.py
> +++ b/nfs4.1/server41tests/st_sequence.py
> @@ -363,3 +363,32 @@ def testBadSequenceidAtSlot(t, env):
>
> res = c.c.compound([op.sequence(sid, nfs4lib.dec_u32(seqid), 2, 3, True)])
> check(res, NFS4ERR_SEQ_MISORDERED)
> +
> +def testReuseSlotID(t, env):
> + """ If client reuses a slot ID and sequence ID for a completely
> + different request, server MAY treat the request as if it is
> + a retry of what it has already executed. rfc5661 18.46.3
> +
> + FLAGS: sequence all
> + CODE: SEQ14
> + """
> + c = env.c1.new_client(env.testname(t))
> + # CREATE_SESSION
> + sess1 = c.create_session()
> +
> + name = "%s_1" % env.testname(t)
> + res = create_file(sess1, name)
> + check(res)
> +
> + sid = sess1.sessionid
> + seqid = nfs4lib.inc_u32(sess1.seqid)
> + dir = sess1.c.homedir
> +
> + res = c.c.compound([op.sequence(sid, seqid, 0, 0, TRUE)] +
> + nfs4lib.use_obj(dir) + [op.remove(name)])
> + check(res)
> +
> + # Reuses slot ID and sequence ID for different request
> + res = c.c.compound([op.sequence(sid, seqid, 0, 0, TRUE)] +
> + nfs4lib.use_obj(dir) + [op.rename(name, "test")])
> + check(res)
> --
> 1.7.4.1
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-22 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-02 6:23 [PATCH 00/17] add some test case for pynfs41 Mi Jinlong
2011-03-02 6:26 ` [PATCH 01/17] CLNT: check NFS4ERR_NOT_ONLY_OP for CREATE_SESSION Mi Jinlong
2011-03-03 5:57 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-02 6:27 ` [PATCH 02/17] CLNT: test lease period of unconfirmed record Mi Jinlong
2011-03-02 6:28 ` [PATCH 03/17] CLNT: check the csr_sequence at CREATE_SESSION Mi Jinlong
2011-03-03 6:02 ` [PATCH 02/17] CLNT: test lease period of unconfirmed record J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-03 9:07 ` Mi Jinlong
2011-03-09 1:29 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-09 1:43 ` Mi Jinlong
2011-03-02 6:29 ` [PATCH 04/17] CLNT: test with ca_maxresponsesize is too small Mi Jinlong
2011-03-02 6:29 ` [PATCH 05/17] CLNT: test reply too big Mi Jinlong
2011-03-02 6:30 ` [PATCH 06/17] CLNT: test reply too big to cache Mi Jinlong
2011-03-02 6:31 ` [PATCH 07/17] CLNT: test operation not in session Mi Jinlong
2011-03-02 6:31 ` [PATCH 08/17] CLNT: test the sessionid, slotid and sequenceid for SEQUENCE Mi Jinlong
2011-03-02 6:32 ` [PATCH 09/17] CLNT: test Bad Sequenceid At Slot Mi Jinlong
2011-03-02 6:33 ` [PATCH 10/17] CLNT: test resues slot ID Mi Jinlong
2011-03-03 6:14 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-03 9:11 ` Mi Jinlong
2011-03-03 14:51 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-04 9:06 ` Mi Jinlong
2011-03-14 18:41 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-14 19:24 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-15 2:47 ` Mi Jinlong
2011-03-17 22:52 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-22 9:44 ` Mi Jinlong
2011-03-22 21:48 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2011-03-23 9:41 ` Mi Jinlong
2011-03-02 6:33 ` [PATCH 11/17] CLNT: DESTROY_SESSION not the fianl operation Mi Jinlong
2011-03-02 6:34 ` [PATCH 12/17] CLNT: test DESTROY_SESSION not the sole operation Mi Jinlong
2011-03-02 6:34 ` [PATCH 13/17] CLNT: add a simple test about RECLAIM_COMPLETE Mi Jinlong
2011-03-02 6:35 ` [PATCH 14/17] CLNT: test reclaim after RECLAIM_COMPLETE Mi Jinlong
2011-03-02 6:36 ` [PATCH 15/17] CLNT: test lock before RECLAIM_COMPLETE Mi Jinlong
2011-03-14 19:27 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-15 3:06 ` Mi Jinlong
2011-03-17 22:54 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-02 6:36 ` [PATCH 16/17] CLNT: test double RECLAIM_COMPLETE after create session Mi Jinlong
2011-03-02 6:37 ` [PATCH 17/17] CLNT: test EXCLUSIVE4_1 for different verifier Mi Jinlong
2011-03-03 5:56 ` [PATCH 00/17] add some test case for pynfs41 J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-28 8:50 ` [PATCH 0/5] a pynfs41 problem and some tests about RECLAIM_COMPLETE Mi Jinlong
2011-03-28 8:57 ` [PATCH 1/5] CLNT: try to destroy session after test complete Mi Jinlong
2011-04-19 15:20 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-04-20 9:33 ` Mi Jinlong
2011-03-28 8:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] CLNT: add a simple test about RECLAIM_COMPLETE Mi Jinlong
2011-03-28 8:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] CLNT: test reclaim after RECLAIM_COMPLETE Mi Jinlong
2011-04-19 22:49 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-28 9:00 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] CLNT: test lock before RECLAIM_COMPLETE Mi Jinlong
2011-03-28 9:00 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] CLNT: test double RECLAIM_COMPLETE after create session Mi Jinlong
2011-04-19 22:51 ` [PATCH 0/5] a pynfs41 problem and some tests about RECLAIM_COMPLETE J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110322214839.GA17784@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).