linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Guntsche <mike@it-loops.com>
To: linux-nfs <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [BUG] sec=krb5 mount problem with nfs-utils 1.2.3 on client side
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 01:20:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110415010913@it-loops.com> (raw)

Hi,

I recently updated my nfs clients and server to the new nfs-utls Version
1.2.3 and then also tested a sec=krb5 mount via nfs4 again. For some reason
the mount failed and I got the following message on the server.

rpc.svcgssd output:
===================
entering poll
leaving poll
handling null request
sname = nfs/zaphod.comsick.at@COMSICK.AT
DEBUG: serialize_krb5_ctx: lucid version!
prepare_krb5_rfc4121_buffer: protocol 1
prepare_krb5_rfc4121_buffer: serializing key with enctype 18 and size 32
doing downcall
mech: krb5, hndl len: 4, ctx len 52, timeout: 1302858643 (35979 from
now), clnt: nfs@zaphod.comsick.at, uid: -1, gid: -1, num aux grps: 0:
: qword_eol: fflush failed: errno 22 (Invalid argument)
WARNING: error writing to downcall channel
/proc/net/rpc/auth.rpcsec.context/channel: Invalid argument
sending null reply
finished handling null request
<repeated 4 times>

Since it worked before I downgraded the versions on both the client and
the server to see when it started working again.

Server with 1.2.3 and  client with 1.2.2 did the trick

rpc.svcgssd output:
===================
entering poll
leaving poll
handling null request
sname = nfs/zaphod.comsick.at@COMSICK.AT
DEBUG: serialize_krb5_ctx: lucid version!
prepare_krb5_rfc1964_buffer: serializing keys with enctype 4 and length
8
doing downcall
mech: krb5, hndl len: 4, ctx len 85, timeout: 1302858893 (36000 from
now), clnt: nfs@zaphod.comsick.at, uid: -1, gid: -1, num aux grps: 0:
sending null reply
finished handling null request
entering poll

So apparently with 1.2.2 on the client side a different enctype is
select. I searched in the archives and saw that this problem was already
known but I did not see any fixes. Both client and server have
aes_generic enabled and loaded I also made sure that the correct keys on
the kerberos side are available.

Valid starting     Expires            Service principal 04/15/11
01:14:53  04/15/11 11:14:53  krbtgt/COMSICK.AT@COMSICK.AT renew until
04/16/11 01:14:53, Etype (skey, tkt): des3-cbc-sha1, des3-cbc-sha1
04/15/11 01:14:53  04/15/11 11:14:53  nfs/gibson.comsick.at@COMSICK.AT
renew until 04/16/11 01:14:53, Etype (skey, tkt): des-cbc-crc,
aes256-cts-hmac-sha1-96 

So right now I am little bit stumped 

* why another enctype is used
* why it does not succeed with the new enctype

Both machines are running kernel 2.6.38 on debian sid with the latest
Kerberos 1.9

If you need more information please tell me.

Kind regards,
Michael Guntsche



             reply	other threads:[~2011-04-14 23:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-14 23:20 Michael Guntsche [this message]
2011-04-15  4:02 ` [BUG] sec=krb5 mount problem with nfs-utils 1.2.3 on client side Vladimir Elisseev
2011-04-15  6:01   ` Finney, Sean
2011-04-15  7:15     ` Vladimir Elisseev
2011-04-15  7:29       ` Finney, Sean
2011-04-15 10:16     ` Michael Guntsche
2011-04-15 13:29       ` Trond Myklebust
2011-04-15 13:31         ` Trond Myklebust
2011-04-15 14:21         ` Kevin Coffman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110415010913@it-loops.com \
    --to=mike@it-loops.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).