From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mta-2.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE ([134.130.7.73]:50959 "EHLO mta-2.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754140Ab1DONUg (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:20:36 -0400 Received: from ironport-out-1.rz.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.5.40]) by mta-2.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.de (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008)) with ESMTP id <0LJP00CP83QA2OH0@mta-2.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.de> for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:20:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gheift ([unknown] [134.130.113.37]) by relay-auth-2.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-3.01 64bit (built Dec 9 2008)) with ESMTPA id <0LJP007ZB3Q6V900@relay-auth-2.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de> for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:20:34 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:20:30 +0200 From: Gerhard Heift To: "J. Bruce Fields" Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: nfsdv4 leaks file descriptors Message-id: <20110415132025.GA6126@gheift> References: <20110412140148.GA17242@gheift> <20110413211211.GA25189@fieldses.org> <20110414054844.GF17242@gheift> <20110414191005.GB1721@fieldses.org> Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 In-reply-to: <20110414191005.GB1721@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 03:10:06PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 07:48:45AM +0200, Gerhard Heift wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 05:12:11PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 04:01:50PM +0200, Gerhard Heift wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > >=20 > > > > I have a linux kernel (2.6.38.2, armv5tel) running which exports a > > > > directory with following options: > > >=20 > > > Should be fixed in more recent stable kernel; let me know if not. > >=20 > > An even more recent stable than 2.6.38.2? I just compiled 2.6.39-rc3 and > > there the leak happens too. >=20 > Ugh. OK, investigating. It took me a bit of time, but I located the commit which introduced this behavior: acfdf5c383b38f7f4dddae41b97c97f1ae058f49 > --b. Regards, Gerhard --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk2oRhkACgkQa8fhU24j2flqsQCghy6uKxhd2h4+cwQig80vTPUI 4NQAoIbty+CLVlWEQo+DoPhHiPNRrZv4 =kP5e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8--