From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: bjschuma@netapp.com
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] NFSD: added FREE_STATEID operation
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 18:56:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110518225609.GA26545@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1305575021-2841-2-git-send-email-bjschuma@netapp.com>
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 03:43:40PM -0400, bjschuma@netapp.com wrote:
> +static __be32
> +nfsd4_free_file_stateid(stateid_t *stateid)
> +{
> + struct nfs4_stateid *stp = search_for_stateid(stateid);
> + if (!stp)
> + return nfserr_bad_stateid;
> + if (stateid->si_generation != 0) {
> + if (stateid->si_generation < stp->st_stateid.si_generation)
> + return nfserr_old_stateid;
> + if (stateid->si_generation > stp->st_stateid.si_generation)
> + return nfserr_bad_stateid;
> + }
> +
> + if (check_for_locks(stp->st_file, stp->st_stateowner))
> + return nfserr_locks_held;
I think this catches a lock stateid, but not an open stateid that has
associated lock stateid's that in turn hold locks.
Hm, also:
"The FREE_STATEID operation is used to free a stateid that no
longer has any associated locks (including opens, byte-range
locks, delegations, and layouts)"
So an open stateid also shouldn't be freeable as long as there are opens
associated with it.
Also I guess a client shouldn't be permitted to free a delegation that
it still holds. That means we'll always just return nfserr_locks for
delegation stateid's. I assume free_stateid is only useful in this case
for the case where a server forcibly revokes part of the client's state
and leaves some "stub" stateid's around in place of the revoked ones.
--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-18 22:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-16 19:43 [PATCH v2 0/2] NFSD: add FREE_STATEID and TEST_STATEID operations bjschuma
2011-05-16 19:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] NFSD: added FREE_STATEID operation bjschuma
2011-05-18 22:56 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2011-05-19 1:12 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-05-19 15:33 ` Bryan Schumaker
2011-05-19 16:30 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-05-19 16:35 ` Bryan Schumaker
2011-05-20 18:29 ` Bryan Schumaker
2011-05-16 19:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] NFSD: Added TEST_STATEID opreation bjschuma
2011-05-18 23:57 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-05-19 15:21 ` Bryan Schumaker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110518225609.GA26545@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=bjschuma@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).