From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: NFS <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd41: check the size of response
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 21:07:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110519010700.GF26545@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DD32CAB.5010405@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:19:23AM +0800, Mi Jinlong wrote:
> Compare response's size to the session se_fmaxresp_sz and
> se_fmaxresp_cached at the same function.
>
> And modify function name nfsd4_check_drc_limit to
> nfsd4_check_response_size.
Hm. I guess that's OK. Note we have a bigger problem, though, which is
that we're waiting too late to check these limits:
http://wiki.linux-nfs.org/wiki/index.php/Server_4.0_and_4.1_issues#DRC_limit_checking
Have you looked at that list, by the way?:
http://wiki.linux-nfs.org/wiki/index.php/Server_4.0_and_4.1_issues#Highest_priority
Those are the 4.1 spec compliance problems that I think are the most
important to fix--the ones that I think we have to get done before we
can really declare the 4.1 server correct.
--b.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> index c6766af..a7cf985 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> @@ -3224,12 +3224,12 @@ static nfsd4_enc nfsd4_enc_ops[] = {
> * pad: add on 8 bytes for the next operation's op_code and status so that
> * there is room to cache a failure on the next operation.
> *
> - * Compare this length to the session se_fmaxresp_cached.
> + * Compare this length to the session se_fmaxresp_sz and se_fmaxresp_cached.
> *
> * Our se_fmaxresp_cached will always be a multiple of PAGE_SIZE, and so
> * will be at least a page and will therefore hold the xdr_buf head.
> */
> -static int nfsd4_check_drc_limit(struct nfsd4_compoundres *resp)
> +static int nfsd4_check_response_size(struct nfsd4_compoundres *resp)
> {
> int status = 0;
> struct xdr_buf *xb = &resp->rqstp->rq_res;
> @@ -3242,7 +3242,7 @@ static int nfsd4_check_drc_limit(struct nfsd4_compoundres *resp)
> return status;
>
> session = resp->cstate.session;
> - if (session == NULL || slot->sl_cachethis == 0)
> + if (session == NULL)
> return status;
>
> if (resp->opcnt >= args->opcnt)
> @@ -3259,10 +3259,14 @@ static int nfsd4_check_drc_limit(struct nfsd4_compoundres *resp)
> dprintk("%s length %u, xb->page_len %u tlen %u pad %u\n", __func__,
> length, xb->page_len, tlen, pad);
>
> - if (length <= session->se_fchannel.maxresp_cached)
> - return status;
> - else
> + if (length > session->se_fchannel.maxresp_sz)
> + return nfserr_rep_too_big;
> +
> + if (slot->sl_cachethis == 1 &&
> + length > session->se_fchannel.maxresp_cached)
> return nfserr_rep_too_big_to_cache;
> +
> + return status;
> }
>
> void
> @@ -3282,8 +3286,8 @@ nfsd4_encode_operation(struct nfsd4_compoundres *resp, struct nfsd4_op *op)
> !nfsd4_enc_ops[op->opnum]);
> op->status = nfsd4_enc_ops[op->opnum](resp, op->status, &op->u);
> /* nfsd4_check_drc_limit guarantees enough room for error status */
> - if (!op->status && nfsd4_check_drc_limit(resp))
> - op->status = nfserr_rep_too_big_to_cache;
> + if (!op->status)
> + op->status = nfsd4_check_response_size(resp);
> status:
> /*
> * Note: We write the status directly, instead of using WRITE32(),
> --
> 1.7.4.5
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-19 1:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-18 2:19 [PATCH] nfsd41: check the size of response Mi Jinlong
2011-05-19 1:07 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2011-05-19 5:35 ` Mi Jinlong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110519010700.GF26545@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).