linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
Cc: Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	xemul@parallels.com, neilb@suse.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bfields@fieldses.org,
	davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/11] SUNRPC: parametrize svc creation calls with portmapper flag
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:08:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110919100811.0eaa39fe@tlielax.poochiereds.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110913181351.3961.70207.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6>

On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:13:51 +0400
Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com> wrote:

> This new flag ("setup_rpcbind) will be used to detect, that new service will
> send portmapper register calls. For such services we will create rpcbind
> clients and remove all stale portmap registrations.
> Also, svc_rpcb_cleanup() will be set as sv_shutdown callback for such services
> in case of this field wasn't initialized earlier. This will allow to destroy
> rpcbind clients when no other users of them left.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
> 
> ---
>  include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h |    2 ++
>  net/sunrpc/svc.c           |   21 ++++++++++++++-------
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
> index 223588a..528952a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
> @@ -402,11 +402,13 @@ struct svc_procedure {
>   * Function prototypes.
>   */
>  struct svc_serv *svc_create(struct svc_program *, unsigned int,
> +			    int setup_rpcbind,
				^^^
			Instead of adding this parameter, why not
			base this on the vs_hidden flag in the
			svc_version? IOW, have a function that looks at
			all the svc_versions for a particular
			svc_program, and returns "true" if any of them
			have vs_hidden unset? The mechanism you're
			proposing here has the potential to be out of
			sync with the vs_hidden flag.

			Also, if you're adding an argument to a
			function like this, you you really ought to
			change the callers in the same patch. Otherwise
			you'll cause a build break if someone tries to
			bisect and ends up between the patch that
			changes the function and the one that changes
			the callers.

>  			    void (*shutdown)(struct svc_serv *));
>  struct svc_rqst *svc_prepare_thread(struct svc_serv *serv,
>  					struct svc_pool *pool);
>  void		   svc_exit_thread(struct svc_rqst *);
>  struct svc_serv *  svc_create_pooled(struct svc_program *, unsigned int,
> +			int setup_rpcbind,
>  			void (*shutdown)(struct svc_serv *),
>  			svc_thread_fn, struct module *);
>  int		   svc_set_num_threads(struct svc_serv *, struct svc_pool *, int);
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc.c b/net/sunrpc/svc.c
> index f31e5cc..03231d5 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/svc.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc.c
> @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ static void svc_rpcb_cleanup(struct svc_serv *serv)
>   */
>  static struct svc_serv *
>  __svc_create(struct svc_program *prog, unsigned int bufsize, int npools,
> -	     void (*shutdown)(struct svc_serv *serv))
> +	     int setup_rpcbind, void (*shutdown)(struct svc_serv *serv))
>  {
>  	struct svc_serv	*serv;
>  	unsigned int vers;
> @@ -437,29 +437,36 @@ __svc_create(struct svc_program *prog, unsigned int bufsize, int npools,
>  		spin_lock_init(&pool->sp_lock);
>  	}
>  
> -	/* Remove any stale portmap registrations */
> -	svc_unregister(serv);
> +	if (setup_rpcbind) {
> +	       	if (svc_rpcb_setup(serv) < 0) {
> +			kfree(serv->sv_pools);
> +			kfree(serv);
> +			return NULL;
> +		}
> +		if (!serv->sv_shutdown)
> +			serv->sv_shutdown = svc_rpcb_cleanup;
> +	}
>  
>  	return serv;
>  }
>  
>  struct svc_serv *
>  svc_create(struct svc_program *prog, unsigned int bufsize,
> -	   void (*shutdown)(struct svc_serv *serv))
> +	   int setup_rpcbind, void (*shutdown)(struct svc_serv *serv))
>  {
> -	return __svc_create(prog, bufsize, /*npools*/1, shutdown);
> +	return __svc_create(prog, bufsize, /*npools*/1, setup_rpcbind, shutdown);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(svc_create);
>  
>  struct svc_serv *
>  svc_create_pooled(struct svc_program *prog, unsigned int bufsize,
> -		  void (*shutdown)(struct svc_serv *serv),
> +		  int setup_rpcbind, void (*shutdown)(struct svc_serv *serv),
>  		  svc_thread_fn func, struct module *mod)
>  {
>  	struct svc_serv *serv;
>  	unsigned int npools = svc_pool_map_get();
>  
> -	serv = __svc_create(prog, bufsize, npools, shutdown);
> +	serv = __svc_create(prog, bufsize, npools, setup_rpcbind, shutdown);
>  
>  	if (serv != NULL) {
>  		serv->sv_function = func;
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-19 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-13 18:13 [PATCH v3 00/11] SUNRPC: make rpcbind clients allocated and destroyed dynamically Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-09-13 18:13 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] SUNRPC: introduce helpers for reference counted rpcbind clients Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-09-13 18:13 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] SUNRPC: use rpcbind reference counting helpers Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-09-13 18:13 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] SUNRPC: introduce svc helpers for prepairing rpcbind infrastructure Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-09-13 18:13 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] SUNRPC: parametrize svc creation calls with portmapper flag Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-09-19 14:08   ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2011-09-19 14:51     ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-09-19 15:07       ` Jeff Layton
2011-09-19 15:42         ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-09-19 18:11           ` Jeff Layton
2011-09-20 10:14             ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-09-13 18:13 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] SUNRPC: cleanup service destruction Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-09-13 18:14 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] Lockd: force creation of rpcbind clients during service creation Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-09-13 18:14 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] NFS: avoid rpcbind clients creation " Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-09-13 18:14 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] NFSd: force creation of rpcbind clients " Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-09-13 18:14 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] NFSd: call svc rpcbind cleanup explicitly Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-09-13 18:14 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] SUNRPC: remove rpcbind clients creation during service registering Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-09-13 18:14 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] SUNRPC: remove rpcbind clients destruction on module cleanup Stanislav Kinsbursky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110919100811.0eaa39fe@tlielax.poochiereds.net \
    --to=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=skinsbursky@parallels.com \
    --cc=xemul@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).