From: Jim Rees <rees@umich.edu>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@tonian.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, peter honeyman <honey@citi.umich.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] pnfs: introduce pnfs private workqueue
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 20:29:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110921002917.GA30770@merit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1316558461.15093.4.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
Trond Myklebust wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 23:18 -0400, Jim Rees wrote:
> From: Peng Tao <bergwolf@gmail.com>
>
> For layoutdriver io done functions, default workqueue is not a good place as
> the code is executed in IO path. So add a pnfs private workqueue to handle
> them.
>
> Also change block and object layout code to make use of this private
> workqueue.
>
Wait, what????
Why is the I/O path (i.e. the nfsiod queue) inappropriate for
layoutdriver io_done functions?
I thought you were the one who asked for this, here:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-nfs/msg22771.html
But looking back on it now, the IO path has changed and I can't tell if the
argument still holds.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-21 0:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-20 3:18 [PATCH 0/3] replacement for "introduce pnfs private workqueue" Jim Rees
2011-09-20 3:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] pnfsblock: add missing rpc_put_mount and path_put Jim Rees
2011-09-20 3:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] pnfs: introduce pnfs private workqueue Jim Rees
2011-09-20 22:41 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-09-21 0:29 ` Jim Rees [this message]
2011-09-21 2:44 ` tao.peng
2011-09-21 4:20 ` Myklebust, Trond
2011-09-21 5:16 ` tao.peng
2011-09-21 7:04 ` Benny Halevy
2011-09-21 10:23 ` tao.peng
2011-09-21 10:38 ` Boaz Harrosh
2011-09-21 11:04 ` tao.peng
2011-09-21 10:56 ` Benny Halevy
2011-09-21 11:10 ` tao.peng
2011-09-21 11:27 ` Benny Halevy
2011-09-21 11:42 ` Boaz Harrosh
2011-09-21 11:50 ` Benny Halevy
2011-09-21 13:56 ` Boaz Harrosh
2011-09-21 15:45 ` Peng Tao
2011-09-21 16:03 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-09-22 3:30 ` tao.peng
2011-09-22 7:17 ` Boaz Harrosh
2011-09-21 4:22 ` Myklebust, Trond
2011-09-20 3:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] SQUASHME: pnfs: simplify and clean up pnfsiod workqueue Jim Rees
2011-09-21 11:52 ` [PATCH 0/3] replacement for "introduce pnfs private workqueue" Benny Halevy
2011-09-21 12:32 ` Jim Rees
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-09-10 17:41 [PATCH 0/3] pnfs private workqueue, and two cleanups Jim Rees
2011-09-10 17:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] pNFS: introduce pnfs private workqueue Jim Rees
2011-09-11 14:51 ` Benny Halevy
2011-09-11 15:15 ` Benny Halevy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110921002917.GA30770@merit.edu \
--to=rees@umich.edu \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=bhalevy@tonian.com \
--cc=honey@citi.umich.edu \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).