From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Leonardo Chiquitto <leonardo.lists@gmail.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
autofs@linux.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: automount should ignore LOOKUP_FOLLOW
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:29:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110922082905.0d43a8f4@tlielax.poochiereds.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87liu37z3x.fsf@tucsk.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 18:06:26 +0200
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote:
> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
>
> Prior to 2.6.38 automount would not trigger on either stat(2) or
> lstat(2) on the automount point.
>
> After 2.6.38, with the introduction of the ->d_automount()
> infrastructure, stat(2) and others would start triggering automount
> while lstat(2), etc. still would not. This is a regression and a
> userspace ABI change.
>
> Problem originally reported here:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.autofs/6098
>
> It appears that there was an attempt at fixing various userspace tools
> to not trigger the automount. But since the stat system call is
> rather common it is impossible to "fix" all userspace.
>
> This patch reverts the original behavior, which is to not trigger on
> stat(2) and other symlink following syscalls.
>
> Reported-by: Leonardo Chiquitto <leonardo.lists@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
> CC: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> CC: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
> CC: stable@kernel.org
> ---
> fs/namei.c | 33 +++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
This patch is causing a regression with NFSv4.
When I mount up a filesystem, and do any activity on it, a new
automount gets triggered on top of the original mountpoint.
The first mount ends up getting the fsid of the pseudo root (fsid=0),
rather than the correct one for the fs. Once it traverses into the
actual filesystem the fsid's look different and d_automount gets
triggered.
I think the problem is that nfs_follow_remote_path() uses
LOOKUP_FOLLOW, and with the above patch this is now ignored.
Let me know if you need details on how to reproduce this.
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-22 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <87liu37z3x.fsf@tucsk.pomaz.szeredi.hu>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110922082905.0d43a8f4@tlielax.poochiereds.net \
--to=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=autofs@linux.kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=leonardo.lists@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=raven@themaw.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).