From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:47671 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751881Ab1JKGTb (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2011 02:19:31 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 08:19:23 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Jeff Layton Cc: trond.myklebust@netapp.com, smfrench@gmail.com, rjw@sisk.pl, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, john@Calva.COM, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] sunrpc: make rpc_wait_bit_killable handle freeze events Message-ID: <20111011061923.GC1377@ucw.cz> References: <1317210761-11518-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> <1317210761-11518-4-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1317210761-11518-4-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed 2011-09-28 07:52:40, Jeff Layton wrote: > Allow the wait_on_bit_killable sleeps in SUNRPC layer to respect the > freezer. This should allow suspend and hibernate events to occur, even > when there are RPC's pending on the wire. Will the RPC protocols used handle that correctly? What will happen during resume? -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html