From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: NFS <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs: fix bug about IPv6 address scope checking
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:39:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111012143904.GA21063@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E953D2E.5080103@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 03:09:34PM +0800, Mi Jinlong wrote:
> The result from ipv6_addr_scope() always not be a single SCOPE,
> so we can't use equal to compare the result with IPV6_ADDR_SCOPE_LINKLOCAL
> at nfs_sockaddr_match_ipaddr6.
>
> This patch fixs the problem, and lets checking address before scope_id.
Looks right to me, thanks; committing unless someone else catches a
problem.
--b.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> fs/nfs/client.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/client.c b/fs/nfs/client.c
> index 5833fbb..b4e41dd 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/client.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/client.c
> @@ -336,11 +336,12 @@ static int nfs_sockaddr_match_ipaddr6(const struct sockaddr *sa1,
> const struct sockaddr_in6 *sin1 = (const struct sockaddr_in6 *)sa1;
> const struct sockaddr_in6 *sin2 = (const struct sockaddr_in6 *)sa2;
>
> - if (ipv6_addr_scope(&sin1->sin6_addr) == IPV6_ADDR_SCOPE_LINKLOCAL &&
> - sin1->sin6_scope_id != sin2->sin6_scope_id)
> + if (!ipv6_addr_equal(&sin1->sin6_addr, &sin2->sin6_addr))
> return 0;
> + else if (ipv6_addr_type(&sin1->sin6_addr) & IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL)
> + return sin1->sin6_scope_id == sin2->sin6_scope_id;
>
> - return ipv6_addr_equal(&sin1->sin6_addr, &sin2->sin6_addr);
> + return 1;
> }
> #else /* !defined(CONFIG_IPV6) && !defined(CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE) */
> static int nfs_sockaddr_match_ipaddr6(const struct sockaddr *sa1,
> --
> 1.7.6
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-12 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-12 7:09 [PATCH] nfs: fix bug about IPv6 address scope checking Mi Jinlong
2011-10-12 14:39 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111012143904.GA21063@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).