From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>,
Linux NFS Mailing list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mount.nfs: mtab corruption when RLIMIT_FSIZE causes a partial write
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:36:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111019173611.GC32028@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E9F0952.2040607@RedHat.com>
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 01:30:58PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
>
>
> On 10/19/2011 01:22 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:10:19 -0400
> > Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 10/19/2011 12:36 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:34:30 -0400
> >>> Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> This patch is a following on to commit 7a802337. Using the
> >>>> tool in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695916
> >>>> caused the fflush() and fclose() to fail in turn causing
> >>>> corruption in the mtab.
> >>>>
> >>>> The failures were in the internals of both calls. Switch those
> >>>> calls with the actual system calls eliminated the failures.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> support/nfs/nfs_mntent.c | 4 ++--
> >>>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/support/nfs/nfs_mntent.c b/support/nfs/nfs_mntent.c
> >>>> index a2118a2..b80f270 100644
> >>>> --- a/support/nfs/nfs_mntent.c
> >>>> +++ b/support/nfs/nfs_mntent.c
> >>>> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ void
> >>>> nfs_endmntent (mntFILE *mfp) {
> >>>> if (mfp) {
> >>>> if (mfp->mntent_fp)
> >>>> - fclose(mfp->mntent_fp);
> >>>> + close(fileno(mfp->mntent_fp));
> >>>> if (mfp->mntent_file)
> >>>> free(mfp->mntent_file);
> >>>> free(mfp);
> >>>> @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ nfs_addmntent (mntFILE *mfp, struct mntent *mnt) {
> >>>> free(m3);
> >>>> free(m4);
> >>>> if (res >= 0) {
> >>>> - res = fflush(mfp->mntent_fp);
> >>>> + res = fsync(fileno(mfp->mntent_fp));
> >>>
> >>> fsync doesn't imply an fflush. With this, I think you may end up
> >>> without everything being committed to disk if part or all of it is
> >>> still in the file stream buffer. You probably want to do an fflush()
> >>> and then an fsync here.
> >> The problem was with the fflush() call. The call was causing the
> >> mount to drop core in turn causing mtab corruption. Changing that
> >> call to a fsync() worked just fine... no corruption... every time!
> >>
> >
> > Ahh, then you have another problem here too then. Most likely it was
> > crashing because it caught a SIGXFSZ. Writing out the mtab should not
> > be affected by signals.
> So calling fflush() generates a SIGXFSZ and call fsync() does not...
fflush() must hit this because it's calling write() to write out the
stream buffer....
But lock_mtab() should have set SIGXFSZ to be ignored; is that not
happening?
> I really don't see what the problem is is call simply calling fsync()
> which clearly works?
We want to make sure the problem's really fixed.
--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-19 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-19 15:34 [PATCH 1/1] mount.nfs: mtab corruption when RLIMIT_FSIZE causes a partial write Steve Dickson
2011-10-19 16:36 ` Jeff Layton
2011-10-19 17:10 ` Steve Dickson
2011-10-19 17:22 ` Jeff Layton
2011-10-19 17:30 ` Steve Dickson
2011-10-19 17:36 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2011-10-19 18:38 ` Steve Dickson
2011-10-19 19:55 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-19 20:00 ` Steve Dickson
2011-10-19 20:01 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-19 17:40 ` Jeff Layton
2011-10-19 18:00 ` Steve Dickson
2011-10-19 17:28 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-19 17:32 ` Steve Dickson
2011-10-19 17:39 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-19 19:44 ` Steve Dickson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111019173611.GC32028@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=SteveD@redhat.com \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).