From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@tonian.com>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>,
NFS list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Bakeathon server fixes
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:58:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111020115859.GK5444@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E9F82FC.2000904@tonian.com>
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 07:10:04PM -0700, Benny Halevy wrote:
> Here's the list of patches I tested here in the Bakeathon.
Thanks, Benny! I need to run some tests of my own, and then I intend to
apply the first four (see individual replies for comments on the last
three).
--b.
> They pass the Connectathon tests over nfsv4.1 (no pnfs)
> against the linux client, but VMware reports a bug with
> OPEN with share_access==0x401 (1025)
> NFS4_SHARE_WANT_NO_DELEG | NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_READ
> return NFS4ERR_GRACE for some reason.
> I haven't been able to track that down yet.
>
> [PATCH 1/7] nfsd4: implement new 4.1 open reclaim types
> [PATCH 2/7] nfsd41: use SEQ4_STATUS_BACKCHANNEL_FAULT when
> [PATCH 3/7] nfsd4: seq->status_flags may be used unitialized
> [PATCH 4/7] nfsd4: allow NFS4_SHARE_SIGNAL_DELEG_WHEN_RESRC_AVAIL |
> [PATCH 5/7] nfsd4: implement NFS4_SHARE_WANT_NO_DELEG,
> [PATCH 6/7] nfsd4: typo logical vs bitwise negate for want_mask
> [PATCH 7/7] nfsd4: share_access_to_flags should consider only nfs4.x
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-20 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-20 2:10 [PATCH 0/7] Bakeathon server fixes Benny Halevy
2011-10-20 2:12 ` [PATCH 1/7] nfsd4: implement new 4.1 open reclaim types Benny Halevy
2011-10-20 12:23 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-20 2:12 ` [PATCH 2/7] nfsd41: use SEQ4_STATUS_BACKCHANNEL_FAULT when cb_sequence is invalid Benny Halevy
2011-10-20 2:13 ` [PATCH 3/7] nfsd4: seq->status_flags may be used unitialized Benny Halevy
2011-10-20 2:13 ` [PATCH 4/7] nfsd4: allow NFS4_SHARE_SIGNAL_DELEG_WHEN_RESRC_AVAIL | NFS4_SHARE_PUSH_DELEG_WHEN_UNCONTENDED Benny Halevy
2011-10-20 2:13 ` [PATCH 5/7] nfsd4: implement NFS4_SHARE_WANT_NO_DELEG, NFS4_OPEN_DELEGATE_NONE_EXT Benny Halevy
2011-10-20 11:52 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-20 12:36 ` Benny Halevy
2011-10-20 12:47 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-20 19:16 ` Benny Halevy
2011-10-20 19:21 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-20 2:13 ` [PATCH 6/7] nfsd4: typo logical vs bitwise negate for want_mask Benny Halevy
2011-10-20 11:53 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-20 2:13 ` [PATCH 7/7] nfsd4: share_access_to_flags should consider only nfs4.x share_access flags Benny Halevy
2011-10-20 11:56 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-20 18:59 ` Benny Halevy
2011-10-20 11:58 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111020115859.GK5444@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=bfields@redhat.com \
--cc=bhalevy@tonian.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).