From: David Flynn <davidf@rd.bbc.co.uk>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: David Flynn <davidf@rd.bbc.co.uk>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID loop
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 18:02:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111029180227.GC2011@rd.bbc.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1319909376.2760.11.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
* Trond Myklebust (Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com) wrote:
> > Using the same kernel, same mountpoint as before, we're currently
> > experiencing a loop involving NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID.
...
> The problem seems like a split-brain issue on the server... On the one
> hand, it is happily telling us that our lease is OK when we RENEW. Then
> when we try to use said lease in an OPEN, it is replying with
> STALE_CLIENTID.
Thank you for the quick update, especially at the weekend. I'm
wondering if it is possible that the STALE_CLIENTID issue is a by-product
of the BAD_STATEID issue from earlier. We have observed several times
the BAD_STATEID loop, but the CLIENTID problem only seemed to occur when
all 40+ nodes were all showing problems.
After killing off sufficient processes, the some of the machines then
recovered of their own accord. So your conclusion that there is a
server issue sounds reasonable.
On any such possible backoff, the previous case was with quite small
requests in quite a tight loop that seemed to cause the server grief.
This morning, a machine with a 10GbE interface had a BAD_STATEID issue
but involving some much larger writes[1], resulting in 1.6Gbit/sec from
that machine alone. Thankfully there was only a second machine with
1GbE interfaces bringing the total up to 2.5Gbit/sec.
It is this ability for a group of clients to make matters worse that
is just as bad as any fault with Solaris.
(In a similar vein, it can be just as frustrating trying to get a client
to stop looping like this - it is often impossible to kill the process
that triggered the problem; for these, we had to resort to deleting
the files using NFSv3 (which was working quite happily))
Thank you again,
..david
[1] Capture: ftp://ftp.kw.bbc.co.uk/davidf/priv/waquahso.pcap
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-29 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-24 10:40 NFS4 BAD_STATEID loop (kernel 3.0) David Flynn
2011-10-24 11:22 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-10-24 13:17 ` David Flynn
2011-10-24 13:32 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-10-24 14:50 ` NFS4 BAD_STATEID loop (kernel 3.0.4) David Flynn
2011-10-24 15:31 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-10-24 15:55 ` David Flynn
2011-10-27 22:17 ` David Flynn
2011-10-29 0:25 ` NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID loop David Flynn
2011-10-29 17:29 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-10-29 18:02 ` David Flynn [this message]
2011-10-29 18:22 ` Myklebust, Trond
2011-10-29 18:23 ` Chuck Lever
2011-10-29 18:26 ` Myklebust, Trond
2011-10-29 18:29 ` David Flynn
2011-10-29 18:15 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-29 18:21 ` Myklebust, Trond
2011-10-29 18:47 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-29 18:50 ` Chuck Lever
2011-10-29 19:19 ` Myklebust, Trond
2011-10-29 19:52 ` David Flynn
2011-10-29 20:42 ` Myklebust, Trond
2011-10-29 21:07 ` David Flynn
2011-10-29 21:12 ` Myklebust, Trond
2011-10-31 13:07 ` Chuck Lever
2011-10-31 13:21 ` David Flynn
2011-10-31 13:39 ` Chuck Lever
2011-10-24 13:43 ` NFS4 BAD_STATEID loop (kernel 3.0) Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111029180227.GC2011@rd.bbc.co.uk \
--to=davidf@rd.bbc.co.uk \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).