From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail-qy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.216.174]:40536 "EHLO mail-qy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750936Ab1K1VJg (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:09:36 -0500 Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:09:30 -0800 From: Tejun Heo To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Jeff Layton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, john@calva.com, trond.myklebust@netapp.com, marek.belisko@gmail.com, awilliam@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] nfs/sunrpc: allow freezing of tasks with NFS calls in flight Message-ID: <20111128210930.GA3858@google.com> References: <1322510488-21189-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> <201111282122.53635.rjw@sisk.pl> <20111128204024.GH18864@google.com> <201111282207.07098.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <201111282207.07098.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello, On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:07:06PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > The point is to let the patches stay in linux-next for a couple of days > before moving them to the pm-freezer branch to see if there's any fallout (I'm > not going to rebase pm-freezer, so fixing it will require addtional commits). Ah.. thanks for the explanation. Yeah, I'm planning on pulling freezer changes into cgroup for cgroup-freezer updates as doing it separately seems to cause a lot of rather unnecessary conflicts so keeping the branch stable would definitely be nice. Thanks. -- tejun