From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
Cc: Harald Dunkel <harri@afaics.de>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFSv4 fsid=0 export still necessary?
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 20:10:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111206011007.GD3678@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EDA5387.5070103@RedHat.com>
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 11:51:19AM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
> No, the fsid=0 export option is no longer necessary to make v4
> exports compatible with v2/v3 exports. When the fsid option
> is not set, the default root is define as "/" which allows
> the v4 clients to mount the same exports as does the v2/v3 clients.
>
> Now if you do not what "/" as your default root, you can
> set fsid to something like fsid=/export. This will
> change to default root to the /export directory which
> means your v4 clients will only be able to access exports
> under the /export directory.
I actually have some old patches that allow you to use an alternate root
for all NFS versions; you'd do something like:
/exports *(ro, root)
/exports/foo *(rw)
/exports/bar *(rw)
and then a v2, v3, or v4 client would mount server:/foo or server:/bar.
But that was just a fun project, it wasn't clear to me whether anyone
wanted it particularly.
Also, that didn't seem like a great user interface. I'd rather have
something like
rootpath=/exports
foo *(rw)
bar *(rw)
Actually, as long as we were doing that I'd rather replace /etc/exports
entirely; maybe do something like
[nfsd]
rootpath=/exports
[export "foo"]
clients=*
options=rw
[exports "bar"]
clients=*
options=rw
And also use the same file for other nfsd parameters:
[nfsd]
versions=2,3,4,4.1
threads=8
rootpath=/exports
[export "foo"]
...
I don't know.
--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-06 1:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-03 11:21 NFSv4 fsid=0 export still necessary? Harald Dunkel
2011-12-03 13:56 ` Jim Rees
2011-12-03 16:51 ` Steve Dickson
2011-12-06 1:10 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2011-12-07 16:30 ` Steve Dickson
2011-12-07 16:32 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-12-07 21:17 ` Steve Dickson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111206011007.GD3678@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=SteveD@redhat.com \
--cc=harri@afaics.de \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).