From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@tonian.com>
Cc: Benny Halevy <benny@tonian.com>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] pnfsd-block: reverse boolean_t values so they make sense
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 06:56:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111206115606.GA8474@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EDDFC39.4090800@tonian.com>
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 01:27:53PM +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
> On 2011-12-06 04:10, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 03:48:16PM +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
> >> From: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@tonian.com>
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@tonian.com>
> >> ---
> >> fs/nfsd/bl_ops.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/bl_ops.c b/fs/nfsd/bl_ops.c
> >> index 89249c4..4d2939e 100644
> >> --- a/fs/nfsd/bl_ops.c
> >> +++ b/fs/nfsd/bl_ops.c
> >> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
> >> #endif
> >>
> >>
> >> -typedef enum {True, False} boolean_t;
> >> +typedef enum {False = 0, True = !False} boolean_t;
> >
> > Shouldn't we just use "bool"?
>
> Yes, in some cases. In others, the boolean status doesn't make sense
> and I'd like to replace it with an integer.
I believe casts from bools to integers are defined to convert false and
true to 0 and 1 respectively, so you should be fine.
--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-06 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-04 13:46 [PATCH 0/13] misc pnfsd patches Benny Halevy
2011-12-04 13:47 ` [PATCH 01/13] SQUASHME: pnfsd: add missing nfs4_unlock_state in nfs4_pnfs_return_layout Benny Halevy
2011-12-04 13:48 ` [PATCH 02/13] DEBUG: pnfsd: printouts Benny Halevy
2011-12-04 13:48 ` [PATCH 03/13] pnfsd-block: reverse boolean_t values so they make sense Benny Halevy
2011-12-06 2:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-12-06 11:27 ` Benny Halevy
2011-12-06 11:56 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2011-12-07 12:45 ` Benny Halevy
2011-12-04 13:48 ` [PATCH 04/13] pnfsd-block: mv include/linux/nfsd4_block.h include/linux/nfsd/ Benny Halevy
2011-12-06 2:12 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-12-06 11:28 ` Benny Halevy
2011-12-04 13:48 ` [PATCH 05/13] pnfsd-block: do not override s_pnfs_op Benny Halevy
2011-12-04 13:48 ` [PATCH 06/13] pnfsd-block: change blr_lock to mutex Benny Halevy
2011-12-04 13:49 ` [PATCH 07/13] pnfsd-block: dprint fiemap rval Benny Halevy
2011-12-04 13:49 ` [PATCH 08/13] pnfsd-block: allow positive " Benny Halevy
2011-12-04 13:49 ` [PATCH 09/13] pnfsd-block: use SECT_SIZE helper macros Benny Halevy
2011-12-04 13:49 ` [PATCH 10/13] pnfsd-block: undo dependence on spnfs Benny Halevy
2011-12-04 13:50 ` [PATCH 11/13] pnfsd-block: set the sbid part of the deviceid Benny Halevy
2011-12-04 13:50 ` [PATCH 12/13] DEBUG: pnfs: printouts Benny Halevy
2011-12-04 13:50 ` [PATCH 13/13] DEBUG: pnfsblock: add devid debug printouts Benny Halevy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111206115606.GA8474@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=benny@tonian.com \
--cc=bhalevy@tonian.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).