From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond@netapp.com>
Cc: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] nfs: treat open-associated setattr like write otc purposes
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 11:40:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111207164001.GC20079@fieldses.org> (raw)
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
For the purposes of open-to-close cache consistency, I don't see why a
setattr (if it's something like "ftruncate", that's associated with an
open) should be treated any differently than a write.
In the v4 case (in the absence of pre-op attributes) that means we
should fake up pre-op attributes as we do for write.
This allows us to handle reads from cache in more cases.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
---
fs/nfs/inode.c | 7 ++++++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
We discussed this a few weeks ago and you seemed amenable to the basic
idea, but I have doubts about my implementation:
- Is this really the right place to do this?
- I'm changing v2/v3 behavior here too, where in the write case
I think it's only v4 that does the
nfs_post_op_update_inode_force_wcc().
Also cc'ing Bryan since I think you suggested he might be interested.
--b.
diff --git a/fs/nfs/inode.c b/fs/nfs/inode.c
index fe12037..b84748e 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/inode.c
@@ -438,8 +438,13 @@ nfs_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr)
if ((attr->ia_valid & (ATTR_MODE|ATTR_UID|ATTR_GID)) != 0)
nfs_inode_return_delegation(inode);
error = NFS_PROTO(inode)->setattr(dentry, fattr, attr);
- if (error == 0)
+ if (error)
+ goto out_free;
+ if (attr->ia_valid & ATTR_FILE)
+ nfs_post_op_update_inode_force_wcc(inode, fattr);
+ else
nfs_refresh_inode(inode, fattr);
+out_free:
nfs_free_fattr(fattr);
out:
return error;
--
1.7.5.4
reply other threads:[~2011-12-07 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111207164001.GC20079@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=bjschuma@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond@netapp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).