From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-image: on nfs4 server: RPC: AUTH_GSS upcall timed out Please check user daemon is running
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 14:10:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111209191057.GA10089@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EE253EC.2040609@fifthhorseman.net>
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 01:31:08PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 12/08/2011 12:45 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > Yes, if you're using NFSv4 then the client and server should each run
> > both daemons.
>
> ah, thanks.
>
> >> If so, what functionality am i losing out on by not running it?
> >
> > You lose NFSv4.0 delegations, which depend on the ability for the server
> > to contact the client to send delegation recalls. Delegations are
> > optional, so you won't lose correctness, but you may lose some
> > performance.
>
> Thanks, that's useful. Do the clients need to run cachefilesd as well
> to take advantage of delegation?
No.
> Is there a document where i could find
> this sort of information without adding noise to the list?
Hm, it should probably be in the FAQ. I think we want to make
http://wiki.linux-nfs.org/
the place to go for Linux NFS information, so if you can't find this
under there somewhere, let's think about where to put it. Suggestions
welcomed.
> > If you're using only v2, v3, or v4.1, that doesn't matter. (v2 and v3
> > lack delegations, and v4.1 sends callbacks over existing
> > client-established connections).
>
> OK, gotcha. Is it possible to use 4.1 with linux kernel 3.1 and
> nfs-utils 1.2.5, or would i need to pull a more recent version?
It should be possible. 4.1 is somewhat new, though.
--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-09 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-08 15:29 linux-image: on nfs4 server: RPC: AUTH_GSS upcall timed out Please check user daemon is running Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2011-12-08 17:45 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-12-09 18:31 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2011-12-09 19:10 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2012-02-23 5:58 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2012-02-28 19:49 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-08-11 13:15 ` Mario Bachmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111209191057.GA10089@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=dkg@fifthhorseman.net \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).