From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Tigran Mkrtchyan <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] more test on current stateid processing
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 15:54:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120115205446.GA29596@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1326654328-20557-1-git-send-email-tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 08:05:23PM +0100, Tigran Mkrtchyan wrote:
>
> This is the result of testing my changes in linux:
>
> $ ./testserver.py --maketree 192.168.178.20:/tmp currentstateid
> .....
>
> **************************************************
> CSID1 st_current_stateid.testOpenAndClose : PASS
> CSID2 st_current_stateid.testLockLockU : PASS
> CSID3 st_current_stateid.testOpenWriteClose : PASS
> CSID4 st_current_stateid.testLockWriteLocku : PASS
> CSID5 st_current_stateid.testOpenPutrootfhClose : PASS
> CSID6 st_current_stateid.testCloseNoStateid : PASS
> CSID7 st_current_stateid.testOpenLayoutGet : FAILURE
> OP_LAYOUTGET should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP
We should fix pynfs41 so no pnfs-dependent tests are run without "pnfs"
being explicitly asked for on the commandline....
--b.
> CSID8 st_current_stateid.testOpenSetattr : PASS
> CSID9 st_current_stateid.testOpenFreestateidClose : PA
>
> **************************************************
> $
>
> Tigran Mkrtchyan (5):
> client: move current stateid test into a dedicated module
> client: test current stateid processing on PUTROOTFH
> client: test current stateid processing with OPEN+LAYOUTGET in a
> single compound
> client: test current stateid processing with OPEN and SETATTR
> client: test OPEN+FREE_STETEID+CLOSE in a single compound
>
> nfs4.1/server41tests/__init__.py | 1 +
> nfs4.1/server41tests/st_current_stateid.py | 161 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> nfs4.1/server41tests/st_open.py | 76 -------------
> 3 files changed, 162 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 nfs4.1/server41tests/st_current_stateid.py
>
> --
> 1.7.7.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-15 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-15 19:05 [PATCH 0/5] more test on current stateid processing Tigran Mkrtchyan
2012-01-15 19:05 ` [PATCH 1/5] client: move current stateid test into a dedicated module Tigran Mkrtchyan
2012-01-15 19:05 ` [PATCH 2/5] client: test current stateid processing on PUTROOTFH Tigran Mkrtchyan
2012-01-15 19:05 ` [PATCH 3/5] client: test current stateid processing with OPEN+LAYOUTGET in a single compound Tigran Mkrtchyan
2012-01-15 19:05 ` [PATCH 4/5] client: test current stateid processing with OPEN and SETATTR Tigran Mkrtchyan
2012-01-15 19:05 ` [PATCH 5/5] client: test OPEN+FREE_STETEID+CLOSE in a single compound Tigran Mkrtchyan
2012-01-15 20:54 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2012-01-15 22:31 ` [PATCH 0/5] more test on current stateid processing Tiramisu Mokka
2012-01-17 16:42 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-01-24 11:53 ` Benny Halevy
2012-01-24 12:18 ` Tigran Mkrtchyan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120115205446.GA29596@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).