From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from minas.ics.muni.cz ([147.251.4.40]:47847 "EHLO minas.ics.muni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755432Ab2ASPuH (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:50:07 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:49:51 +0100 From: Lukas Hejtmanek To: Michael Schwartzkopff Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: NFSv4 and high-availability Message-ID: <20120119154951.GV10362@ics.muni.cz> References: <20120119135044.GS10362@ics.muni.cz> <201201191552.30691.misch@schwartzkopff.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 In-Reply-To: <201201191552.30691.misch@schwartzkopff.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 03:52:30PM +0100, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote: > Yes. You can setup a NFSv4 cluster using a cluster manager like pacemaker. > > Last time I set it up there were some issues with locking and timeouts. I > don't know if this is already fixed. I'd have to try it myself again. but this seems to be the mentioned server side HA mode. But can I move running client to another server (with anoter different IP)? -- Lukáš Hejtmánek