From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Andrei Warkentin <awarkentin@vmware.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFSv3 mounts issue (get stale errors).
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:54:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120126205405.GB700@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <420810398.113477.1327555008193.JavaMail.root@zimbra-prod-mbox-2.vmware.com>
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 09:16:48PM -0800, Andrei Warkentin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I genuinly tried to look for anything on this issue, so I apologize in advance if it was covered before.
> Anyway, I've seen something like this while trying to mount a share (which is authorized to a set of specific IP):
> 1) One mount from one host succeeds.
> 2) Other mounts fail with stale fh error.
>
> Kernel is 3.2.
>
> Log contains something like:
> Jan 25 18:03:44 localhost rpc.mountd[6844]: nfsd_fh: inbuf '10.150.27.241 6 \x150ad1f8b9824ea5a1bfafa56e92fa0b'
> Jan 25 18:03:44 localhost rpc.mountd[6844]: /exports and /exports/abracadabra have same filehandle for 10.150.27.241, using first
That sounds like a bug....
> Jan 25 18:03:44 localhost rpc.mountd[6844]: qword_eol: fflush failed: errno 22 (Invalid argument)
> Jan 25 18:03:44 localhost rpc.mountd[6844]: Cannot export /exports, possibly unsupported filesystem or fsid= required
>
> ...where /exports/abracadabra is the actual export, and /exports is this pseudoexport for NFSv4.
Note we don't recommend that any more if you're using recent enough
kernel and nfs-utils. If you leave out the fsid=0 export and export
normally, your export will be visible to v4 clients under its real path
(the same path v2/v3 clients would see.)
> Granted, my nfs-utils is old (1.2.3). I've looked at the latest tarball, 1.2.5, yet I don't think
There are a few fixes in that general area since 1.2.3.
--b.
> this would still help me out very much, as subexport checks for NFSEXP_CROSSMOUNT, which is not set.
> (/exports/abracadabra 10.150.27.220(rw,no_root_squash,sync,no_wdelay,no_subtree_check,uuid=b5ffa269:e068456b:9d95fb6a:f2a8f431)
>
> cache.c: static void nfsd_fh(FILE *f) {
> ...
> if (!found || subexport(&exp->m_export, found)) {
> found = &exp->m_export;
> free(found_path);
> found_path = strdup(path);
> if (found_path == NULL)
> goto out;
> } else if (strcmp(found->e_path, exp->m_export.e_path)
> && !subexport(found, &exp->m_export))
> xlog(L_WARNING, "%s and %s have same filehandle for %s using fi\
> rst",
> found_path, path, dom);
> }
> ...
> }
>
> Is my thinking wrong? Wouldn't it still pick up (in error) /exports? Does this mean that mountd needs to know if the nfsd.fh request
> was for a NFSv3 or NFSv4 mount?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-26 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <946833378.113316.1327554221600.JavaMail.root@zimbra-prod-mbox-2.vmware.com>
2012-01-26 5:16 ` NFSv3 mounts issue (get stale errors) Andrei Warkentin
2012-01-26 20:54 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120126205405.GB700@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=awarkentin@vmware.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).