linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Benny Halevy <benny@tonian.com>
Cc: bfields@redhat.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] nfsd41: implement NFS4_SHARE_WANT_NO_DELEG, NFS4_OPEN_DELEGATE_NONE_EXT, why_no_deleg
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:14:11 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120217221411.GA3627@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1329418637-23925-1-git-send-email-bhalevy@tonian.com>

On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 08:57:17PM +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
> Respect client request for not getting a delegation in NFSv4.1
> Appropriately return delegation "type" NFS4_OPEN_DELEGATE_NONE_EXT
> and WND4_NOT_WANTED reason.

These all look fine, just two nits:

> @@ -2903,11 +2903,32 @@ static int nfs4_set_delegation(struct nfs4_delegation *dp, int flag)
>  	dprintk("NFSD: delegation stateid=" STATEID_FMT "\n",
>  		STATEID_VAL(&dp->dl_stid.sc_stateid));
>  out:
> -	if (open->op_claim_type == NFS4_OPEN_CLAIM_PREVIOUS
> -			&& flag == NFS4_OPEN_DELEGATE_NONE
> -			&& open->op_delegate_type != NFS4_OPEN_DELEGATE_NONE)
> -		dprintk("NFSD: WARNING: refusing delegation reclaim\n");
>  	open->op_delegate_type = flag;
> +	if (flag == NFS4_OPEN_DELEGATE_NONE) {
> +		if (open->op_claim_type == NFS4_OPEN_CLAIM_PREVIOUS &&
> +		    open->op_delegate_type != NFS4_OPEN_DELEGATE_NONE)
> +			dprintk("NFSD: WARNING: refusing delegation reclaim\n");
> +
> +		if (open->op_deleg_want) {
> +			open->op_delegate_type = NFS4_OPEN_DELEGATE_NONE_EXT;
> +			if (status == -EAGAIN)
> +				open->op_why_no_deleg = WND4_CONTENTION;
> +			else {
> +				open->op_why_no_deleg = WND4_RESOURCE;
> +				switch (open->op_deleg_want) {
> +				case NFS4_SHARE_WANT_READ_DELEG:
> +				case NFS4_SHARE_WANT_WRITE_DELEG:
> +				case NFS4_SHARE_WANT_ANY_DELEG:
> +					break;
> +				case NFS4_SHARE_WANT_CANCEL:
> +					open->op_why_no_deleg = WND4_CANCELLED;
> +					break;
> +				case NFS4_SHARE_WANT_NO_DELEG:
> +					BUG();	/* not supposed to get here */
> +				}
> +			}
> +		}
> +	}

This looks like a reasonably well-encapsulated bit of code--could you
move it into a helper function?

>  out:
> +	/* 4.1 client trying to upgrade/downgrade delegation? */
> +	if (open->op_delegate_type == NFS4_OPEN_DELEGATE_NONE && dp &&
> +	    open->op_deleg_want) {
> +		if (open->op_deleg_want == NFS4_SHARE_WANT_READ_DELEG &&
> +		    dp->dl_type == NFS4_OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE) {
> +			open->op_delegate_type = NFS4_OPEN_DELEGATE_NONE_EXT;
> +			open->op_why_no_deleg = WND4_NOT_SUPP_DOWNGRADE;
> +		} else if (open->op_deleg_want == NFS4_SHARE_WANT_WRITE_DELEG &&
> +			   dp->dl_type == NFS4_OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE) {
> +			open->op_delegate_type = NFS4_OPEN_DELEGATE_NONE_EXT;
> +			open->op_why_no_deleg = WND4_NOT_SUPP_UPGRADE;
> +		}
> +		/* Otherwise the client must be confused wanting a delegation
> +		 * it already has, therefore we don't return
> +		 * NFS4_OPEN_DELEGATE_NONE_EXT and reason.
> +		 */
> +	}

Ditto for this.

I'll go ahead and apply the previous two patches pending some regression
tests.

--b.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-17 22:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-16 18:46 [PATCH 0/3] nfsd41: want delegation flags Benny Halevy
2012-02-16 18:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] nfsd41: share_access_to_flags should consider only nfs4.x share_access flags Benny Halevy
2012-02-16 18:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] nfsd41: split out share_access want and signel flags while decoding Benny Halevy
2012-02-16 18:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] nfsd41: implement NFS4_SHARE_WANT_NO_DELEG, NFS4_OPEN_DELEGATE_NONE_EXT, why_no_deleg Benny Halevy
2012-02-17 22:14   ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2012-02-18  8:02     ` Benny Halevy
2012-02-18  8:16       ` [PATCH 1/2] nfsd41: refactor nfs4_open_deleg_none_ext logic out of nfs4_open_delegation Benny Halevy
2012-02-18  8:17       ` [PATCH 2/2] nfsd41: refactor nfsd4_deleg_xgrade_none_ext logic out of nfsd4_process_open2 Benny Halevy
2012-02-18 14:41       ` [PATCH 3/3] nfsd41: implement NFS4_SHARE_WANT_NO_DELEG, NFS4_OPEN_DELEGATE_NONE_EXT, why_no_deleg J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-20 15:47         ` Benny Halevy
2012-03-07 13:14           ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120217221411.GA3627@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=benny@tonian.com \
    --cc=bfields@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).