linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Fu Liankun <fuliankun@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: spnfs write performance issue
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:25:10 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120222172510.GA12708@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F44C071.8010104@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 06:16:17PM +0800, Fu Liankun wrote:
> When copy a big file(about 500MB) to nfs server using pnfs, it cost
> obvious longer time as compared with NFSv3 or NFSv4 protocol.
> 
> PNFS cost about 300-550s
> NFSv3 cost about 49s
> NFSv4 cost about 49s
> 
> My test environment as following:
> 
> MDS: 3.1.0-rc8-pnfs   ipaddr1: 192.168.0.100, ipaddr2:192.168.1.100
> DS1: 3.1.0-rc8-pnfs   ipaddr1: 192.168.0.101, ipaddr2:192.168.1.101
> DS2: 3.1.0-rc8-pnfs   ipaddr1: 192.168.0.102, ipaddr2:192.168.1.102
> client: RHEL6.2GA(2.6.32-220.el6.i686)    ipaddr1: 192.168.0.19,

What kind of server are you using?

--b.

> ipaddr2:192.168.1.19
> 
> 192.168.1.100 <-------- NFS4.1 connection --------->192.168.1.101
> 192.168.0.100 <-------- NFS4.1 connection --------->192.168.0.102
> 192.168.0.19  <-------- NFS4.1 connection --------->192.168.0.100
> 
> Dunring the write process, the client output the message:
> FS-Cache: Loaded
> FS-Cache: Netfs 'nfs' registered for caching
> nfs4filelayout_init: NFSv4 File Layout Driver Registering...
> nfs: server 192.168.1.101 not responding, timed out
> 
> The message "nfs: server 192.168.1.101 not responding, timed out" was
> output during the COMMIT request.
> 
> Who can tell me the reason why pnfs cost so long time.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-22 17:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-22 10:16 spnfs write performance issue Fu Liankun
2012-02-22 17:25 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2012-02-27  6:27   ` Fu Liankun
2012-02-27 12:01     ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-28  1:32       ` Fu Liankun
2012-02-28  1:46         ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-28  1:48           ` Fu Liankun
2012-02-28  1:53             ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-28  2:14               ` Fu Liankun
2012-02-28  9:27               ` Benny Halevy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120222172510.GA12708@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=fuliankun@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).