Re: [PATCH] NFSv4: Add modalias for "nfs4"

[Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>]

On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:02:07 +0000
"Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 10:53 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 02:50:28PM +0000, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 10:48 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:19:18AM -0400, Jim Rees wrote:
> > > > > Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > >   When NFSv4 is configured, the support goes into the nfs.ko module.
> > > > >   However, nfs-utils seems to pass "nfs4" as the fileststem type for
> > > > >   NFSv4 mounts.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Weren't we going to change that to nfs and use nfsvers to select nfs4?
> > > > 
> > > > I have, approximately, no idea.  At least the version of nfs-utils found
> > > > in Fedora 17 and rawhide, it's still using "nfs4".   I believe that is
> > > > nfs-utils-1.2.6-rc6 based.
> > > 
> > > nfs4 is still _supported_ in Fedora 17, rawhide and upstream as a legacy
> > > feature, but the recommended practice should be to mount -t nfs -overs=4
> > > (or -overs=4.1).
> > 
> > OK.  So either this patch needs to go in, or something needs to add:
> > 
> > alias nfs4 nfs
> > 
> > to a conf file so modprobe picks it up.  I figured the kernel could add
> > the alias itself.  Is there a reason not to?
> 
> Yes. This is a legacy feature that we want to encourage people to move
> their systems off...
> 

Ahh ok...I guess I didn't get that memo. In that case, is there a plan
to deprecate the nfs4 fstype altogether?

Otherwise, you're going to end up with inconsistent behavior with "-t
nfs4", depending on whether nfs.ko is already plugged in at the time or
not.

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>