From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: steved@redhat.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsdcld: add support for dropping capabilities
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 16:08:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120508200848.GD17669@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120508160343.1114f01c@corrin.poochiereds.net>
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 04:03:43PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> With this, root is basically a user like any other. He has to have
> explicit permissions to access anything. If another user owns a file
> and it's not world readable (or group readable by a group to which root
> is a member), then the process won't be able to read it. Granted, a lot
> of files are owned by root on a typical machine,
... including, looking at my Fedora box, /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow, the
entire contents of /usr/bin, all sorts of interesting /proc files....
Sounds like game over? Maybe not if selinux or something else
intervenes.
> but this should still
> prevent access to any that aren't.
>
> This also trims out all of the other extraneous stuff we don't need --
> being able to bind to low sockets, traverse directories in which root
> has no explicit access, chown ability, etc...
>
> There are a couple of other approaches we could take here instead:
>
> 1) we could run as an unprivileged user and keep CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE.
> I think that's less safe than what I'm doing here though...
>
> 2) we could teach the kernel to create the pipe with a different owner
> and then run the daemon as a non-root user. That means we'd need some
> mechanism to tell the kernel what we want that owner to be. I'm not
> sure how that would work in practice -- maybe a new file
> in /proc/fs/nfsd ?
>
> In any case, I think this is probably good enough for now. This daemon
> doesn't listen on a socket or anything so any compromise of it would
> be a local one. Users also don't generally interact with it directly,
> so you'd need to jump through some hoops in order to break it I'd
> think.
Sure.
--b.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-08 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-08 15:41 [PATCH] nfsdcld: add support for dropping capabilities Jeff Layton
2012-05-08 19:34 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-08 20:03 ` Jeff Layton
2012-05-08 20:08 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120508200848.GD17669@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steved@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).