Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: trond.myklebust@netapp.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] NFS: Force server to drop NFSv4 state
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 12:16:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120521161646.GJ24299@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F7B056E4-D6FC-450B-98E2-129C051CFAE7@oracle.com>

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:11:48PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> 
> On May 21, 2012, at 12:08 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 06:06:33PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >> @@ -3937,8 +3937,13 @@ static void nfs4_construct_boot_verifier(struct nfs_client *clp,
> >> {
> >> 	__be32 verf[2];
> >> 
> >> -	verf[0] = (__be32)clp->cl_boot_time.tv_sec;
> >> -	verf[1] = (__be32)clp->cl_boot_time.tv_nsec;
> >> +	if (test_bit(NFS4CLNT_PURGE_STATE, &clp->cl_state)) {
> >> +		verf[0] = (__be32)CURRENT_TIME.tv_sec;
> >> +		verf[1] = (__be32)CURRENT_TIME.tv_nsec;
> > 
> > I suppose it's pretty unlikely this could happen within a jiffy of
> > setting cl_boot_time?
> 
> Boot time has nanosecond resolution.  I'm pretty sure we are safe here.

CURRENT_TIME is only updated every jiffy.  It would still have to happen
ridiculously fast, but I think that's milliseconds rather than
nanoseconds.

> > Would it be simpler to use some special value (all-zeros?) instead?
> 
> We'd have to pick a value that was guaranteed never to be a valid time stamp.

A client that thinks it's currently Jan. 1 1970 probably has bigger
problems.

I dunno, your call.

--b.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-21 16:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-18 22:05 [PATCH 00/14] UCS pre-requisites for 3.5 Chuck Lever
2012-05-18 22:05 ` [PATCH 01/14] NFS: Fix comment misspelling in struct nfs_client definition Chuck Lever
2012-05-18 22:05 ` [PATCH 02/14] NFS: Use proper naming conventions for NFSv4.1 server scope fields Chuck Lever
2012-05-19 21:08   ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-05-18 22:05 ` [PATCH 03/14] NFS: Use proper naming conventions for nfs_client.impl_id field Chuck Lever
2012-05-21 15:06   ` Adamson, Dros
2012-05-18 22:05 ` [PATCH 04/14] NFS: Use proper naming conventions for the nfs_client.net field Chuck Lever
2012-05-18 22:05 ` [PATCH 05/14] NFS: Clean up return code checking in nfs4_proc_exchange_id() Chuck Lever
2012-05-21 15:10   ` Adamson, Dros
2012-05-21 15:19     ` Chuck Lever
2012-05-18 22:06 ` [PATCH 06/14] NFS: Remove nfs_unique_id Chuck Lever
2012-05-18 22:06 ` [PATCH 07/14] NFS: Don't swap bytes in nfs4_construct_boot_verifier() Chuck Lever
2012-05-21 15:40   ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-21 15:47     ` Chuck Lever
2012-05-21 15:51       ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-18 22:06 ` [PATCH 08/14] NFS: Add NFSDBG_STATE Chuck Lever
2012-05-18 22:06 ` [PATCH 09/14] NFS: Force server to drop NFSv4 state Chuck Lever
2012-05-21 16:08   ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-21 16:11     ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-21 16:11     ` Chuck Lever
2012-05-21 16:16       ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2012-05-21 16:24         ` Chuck Lever
2012-05-21 16:49           ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-05-18 22:06 ` [PATCH 10/14] NFS: Always use the same SETCLIENTID boot verifier Chuck Lever
2012-05-18 22:06 ` [PATCH 11/14] NFS: Refactor nfs_get_client(): add nfs_found_client() Chuck Lever
2012-05-18 22:06 ` [PATCH 12/14] NFS: Refactor nfs_get_client(): initialize nfs_client Chuck Lever
2012-05-18 22:07 ` [PATCH 13/14] NFS: Add nfs_client behavior flags Chuck Lever
2012-05-18 22:07 ` [PATCH 14/14] NFS: EXCHANGE_ID should save the server major and minor ID Chuck Lever
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-05-22  2:44 [PATCH 00/14 v2] UCS pre-requisites for 3.5 Chuck Lever
2012-05-22  2:45 ` [PATCH 09/14] NFS: Force server to drop NFSv4 state Chuck Lever

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120521161646.GJ24299@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@netapp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox