From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] vfs: fix outdated i_mutex_lock_class documentation
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 16:11:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120531201150.GE25955@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120531185439.GB13647@quack.suse.cz>
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 08:54:39PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 31-05-12 20:51:11, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Wed 30-05-12 21:50:12, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > include/linux/fs.h | 3 ++-
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> > > index 038076b..5584a29 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> > > @@ -861,7 +861,8 @@ static inline int inode_unhashed(struct inode *inode)
> > > * 0: the object of the current VFS operation
> > > * 1: parent
> > > * 2: child/target
> > > - * 3: quota file
> > > + * 3: xattr
> > > + * 4: quota file
> > This isn't correct anymore, is it? Just remove references to quota in this
> > comment...
> Oh, now I've noticed patch 6/6. Maybe this patch and 6/6 should be just
> joined into one?
Sure.--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-31 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-31 1:50 rename locking J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-31 1:50 ` [PATCH 1/6] gfs2: Get rid of I_MUTEX_QUOTA usage J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-31 7:50 ` Steven Whitehouse
2012-05-31 12:14 ` Bob Peterson
2012-05-31 1:50 ` [PATCH 2/6] vfs: fix outdated i_mutex_lock_class documentation J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-31 18:51 ` Jan Kara
2012-05-31 18:54 ` Jan Kara
2012-05-31 20:11 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2012-05-31 20:14 ` [PATCH 6/6 (v2)] vfs: rename I_MUTEX_QUOTA now that it's not used for quotas J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-31 1:50 ` [PATCH 3/6] vfs: pull ext4's double-i_mutex-locking into common code J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-31 1:50 ` [PATCH 4/6] vfs: don't use PARENT/CHILD lock classes for non-directories J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-31 1:50 ` [PATCH 5/6] vfs: take i_mutex on renamed file J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-31 1:50 ` [PATCH 6/6] vfs: rename I_MUTEX_QUOTA now that it's not used for quotas J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120531201150.GE25955@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=bfields@redhat.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).