From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFS regression in v3.5-rc1: mount.nfs yells about incorrect mount option
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 15:33:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120608133317.GW12795@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FD1FC02.2000608@netapp.com>
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 09:20:02AM -0400, Bryan Schumaker wrote:
> On 06/08/2012 09:03 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 11:54:24AM -0400, Bryan Schumaker wrote:
> >> On 06/07/2012 11:50 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> >>> mount -o nfsvers=3 ...
> >>
> >> What about `mount -o vers=4 ...`? I'm compiling a kernel right now to
> >> see if I can reproduce this, what NFS .config options do you have set?
> >> (`cat .config | grep CONFIG_NFS_` should be good enough).
> >
> > Okay, I tracked it down somewhat. The problem is that the nfs-version
> > is not set in my case so that data->version in nfs_init_server is 0. The
> > function returns -EPROTONOSUPPORT in this case which causes the mount
> > to fail. The evil commit is db8333519 and reverting it fixes the issue
> > for me. Patch attached.
>
> Thanks! I wasn't able to reproduce this on Ubuntu 12.04, so now I'm
> setting up 10.04 to see if that makes a difference. I'd like to
> understand what's going on (and why my other patch didn't fix this
> problem) before reverting.
Your other patch only touched the nfs4 path, but in my setup nfs3 was in
use. Therefore the patch didn't help. I just figured out that
nfs_fs_mount is shared between nfs23 and nfs4, so the first patch
probably breaks nfs4. I send another one which takes this into account.
Regards,
Joerg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-08 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-07 15:04 NFS regression in v3.5-rc1: mount.nfs yells about incorrect mount option Joerg Roedel
2012-06-07 15:12 ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-06-07 15:17 ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-06-07 15:43 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-06-07 15:31 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-06-07 15:50 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-06-07 15:54 ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-06-07 16:01 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-06-07 17:23 ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-06-07 19:33 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-06-08 13:03 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-06-08 13:20 ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-06-08 13:33 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2012-06-08 13:37 ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-06-08 13:49 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-06-08 15:28 ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-06-08 13:30 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120608133317.GW12795@8bytes.org \
--to=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=bjschuma@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).