linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFS regression in v3.5-rc1: mount.nfs yells about incorrect mount option
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 15:49:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120608134905.GX12795@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FD1FFFD.3020301@netapp.com>

On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 09:37:01AM -0400, Bryan Schumaker wrote:
> On 06/08/2012 09:33 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:

> > Your other patch only touched the nfs4 path, but in my setup nfs3 was in
> > use. Therefore the patch didn't help. I just figured out that
> > nfs_fs_mount is shared between nfs23 and nfs4, so the first patch
> > probably breaks nfs4. I send another one which takes this into account.
> 
> Would something like this work? (I haven't tried it yet).  Setting it
> in nfs_alloc_parsed_mount_data() might work too...
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/super.c b/fs/nfs/super.c
> index bdd6731..906f09c 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/super.c
> @@ -1867,6 +1867,7 @@ static int nfs23_validate_mount_data(void *options,
>         if (data == NULL)
>                 goto out_no_data;
>  
> +       args->version = NFS_DEFAULT_VERSION;
>         switch (data->version) {
>         case 1:
>                 data->namlen = 0;
> --

Yes, this works too (tested). Doing it in nfs_alloc_parsed_mount_data()
need to take into account that the function is also called for nfs4.
This is basically what my second revert-patch does.


	Joerg



  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-08 13:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-07 15:04 NFS regression in v3.5-rc1: mount.nfs yells about incorrect mount option Joerg Roedel
2012-06-07 15:12 ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-06-07 15:17   ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-06-07 15:43     ` Joerg Roedel
2012-06-07 15:31   ` Joerg Roedel
2012-06-07 15:50   ` Joerg Roedel
2012-06-07 15:54     ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-06-07 16:01       ` Joerg Roedel
2012-06-07 17:23         ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-06-07 19:33           ` Joerg Roedel
2012-06-08 13:03       ` Joerg Roedel
2012-06-08 13:20         ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-06-08 13:33           ` Joerg Roedel
2012-06-08 13:37             ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-06-08 13:49               ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2012-06-08 15:28                 ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-06-08 13:30         ` Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120608134905.GX12795@8bytes.org \
    --to=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=bjschuma@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).