From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from fieldses.org ([174.143.236.118]:41401 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753152Ab2FMLPi (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jun 2012 07:15:38 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 07:15:35 -0400 From: "J. Bruce Fields" To: Stanislav Kinsbursky Cc: "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" , "Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devel@openvz.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFS: hard-code init_net for NFS callback transports Message-ID: <20120613111535.GA32085@fieldses.org> References: <20120601095424.24427.74720.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20120611123718.GF7654@fieldses.org> <20120612155358.GB22028@fieldses.org> <4FD84C47.8080505@parallels.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: <4FD84C47.8080505@parallels.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:16:07PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote: > 12.06.2012 19:53, J. Bruce Fields написал: > >On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 08:37:18AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > >>On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 01:55:47PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote: > >>>This patch set is a bug fix for Bruce's 3.5 branch. > >>>I'll rebase this for 3.4 and resend. > >> > >>Apologies for neglecting this, I'm done with the bakeathon and should be > >>back to this soon. > >> > >>But, I'm a bit confused: you say you'll rebase this, but I've only seen > >>two rebased patches for 3.4, and neither looks like a simple rebase of > >>this one. > > > >Oh, I see; the backport of "SUNRPC: new svc_bind() routine introduced" > >is a combination of the patch by the same name upstream with this one. > > > >In future for backports I'd rather keep a one-to-one correspondance > >between the original patches and the backported patches. (Even if that > >means 4.2 might not be as "bisectable".) > > > >Also, get this patch into stable by just adding a "cc: > >stable@vger.kernel.org" with the signed-off at the end of this patch. > > > >I've gone ahead and fixed that up; results in the "for-3.4" and > >"for-3.5" branches of > > > > git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux-topics.git > > > >Let me know if anything looks wrong. > > > > > Hi, Bruce. Thanks for you time and guidance with this patch set. > But I'm a bit confused - what I have to do now? Take the patches > from your 3.4 branch and send them to "stable"? No, I'll take care of them.--b. --b.