From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] SUNRPC: new svc_bind() routine introduced
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:18:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120620181835.GA8356@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120620180928.GB24777@pad.fieldses.org>
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 02:09:29PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 09:34:27AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 04:07:27PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > From: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
> > >
> > > commit cd96891d48a945ca2011fbeceda73813d6286195 upstream.
> >
> > Um, no, that's not what this commit id is at all.
>
> Whoops, sorry! Should have been 9793f7c88. Upstream commits on #2 and
> #3 are correct.
>
> > Where did you get that from? I kind of don't trust this series now,
> > care to fix these up with the correct git commit ids and resend them?
>
> Sure, I'll resend once I get the "4/3" patch sorted out.
>
> (That got a form rejection--I assume it was the missing upstream commit
> ID? That's because there isn't one--3.4 requires a different fix. But
> I can point to where the bug got fixed upstream even if it isn't the
> same.)
You need to be really specific when sending a patch that is not
upstream, detailing why it isn't, and what different fix went in
upstream, if possible.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-20 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-18 20:07 3.4.z nfsd backports J. Bruce Fields
2012-06-18 20:07 ` [PATCH 1/3] SUNRPC: new svc_bind() routine introduced J. Bruce Fields
2012-06-20 16:34 ` Greg KH
2012-06-20 18:09 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-06-20 18:18 ` Greg KH [this message]
2012-06-25 20:33 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-06-25 20:44 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-06-18 20:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] SUNRPC: move per-net operations from svc_destroy() J. Bruce Fields
2012-06-18 20:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] NFS: hard-code init_net for NFS callback transports J. Bruce Fields
2012-06-20 13:27 ` [PATCH 4/3] lockd: hard-code init_net in lockd case as well J. Bruce Fields
2012-06-20 14:54 ` Greg KH
2012-06-20 16:35 ` 3.4.z nfsd backports Greg KH
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-04-25 13:37 [PATCH 0/3] SUNRPC: separate per-net data creation from service creation Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-04-25 13:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] SUNRPC: new svc_bind() routine introduced Stanislav Kinsbursky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120620181835.GA8356@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bfields@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=skinsbursky@parallels.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).