linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "bfields@fieldses.org" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>,
	"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devel@openvz.org" <devel@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: return negative value in case rpcbind client creation error
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 19:23:16 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120730232316.GC21730@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1343689924.8362.4.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:12:05PM +0000, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 15:57 +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> > Without this patch kernel will panic on LockD start, because lockd_up() checks
> > lockd_up_net() result for negative value.
> > >From my pow it's better to return negative value from rpcbind routines instead
> > of replacing all such checks like in lockd_up().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
> > ---
> >  net/sunrpc/rpcb_clnt.c |    4 ++--
> >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/rpcb_clnt.c b/net/sunrpc/rpcb_clnt.c
> > index 92509ff..a70acae 100644
> > --- a/net/sunrpc/rpcb_clnt.c
> > +++ b/net/sunrpc/rpcb_clnt.c
> > @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static int rpcb_create_local_unix(struct net *net)
> >  	if (IS_ERR(clnt)) {
> >  		dprintk("RPC:       failed to create AF_LOCAL rpcbind "
> >  				"client (errno %ld).\n", PTR_ERR(clnt));
> > -		result = -PTR_ERR(clnt);
> > +		result = PTR_ERR(clnt);
> >  		goto out;
> >  	}
> >  
> > @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ static int rpcb_create_local_net(struct net *net)
> >  	if (IS_ERR(clnt)) {
> >  		dprintk("RPC:       failed to create local rpcbind "
> >  				"client (errno %ld).\n", PTR_ERR(clnt));
> > -		result = -PTR_ERR(clnt);
> > +		result = PTR_ERR(clnt);
> >  		goto out;
> >  	}
> 
> Who is supposed to carry this patch? Is it Bruce or is it me?

Works either way.  Either way--it looks like the bug was introduced with

c526611dd631b2802b6b0221ffb306c5fa25c86c "SUNRPC: Use a cached RPC
client and transport for rpcbind upcalls" and
7402ab19cdd5943c7dd4f3399afe3abda8077ef5 "SUNRPC: Use AF_LOCAL for
rpcbind upcalls"

and should go to stable as well.

(Looks like I said that before but accidentally dropped everyone off the
cc.)

--b.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-30 23:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-20 11:57 [PATCH] SUNRPC: return negative value in case rpcbind client creation error Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-07-30 23:12 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-07-30 23:23   ` bfields [this message]
2012-07-31  7:46   ` Stanislav Kinsbursky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120730232316.GC21730@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=devel@openvz.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=skinsbursky@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).