linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>, Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
Cc: NFS <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: nfs-utils: Something is wrong in is_vers4()
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:58:42 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120731165842.08017d60@notabene.brown> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1645 bytes --]


in nfs-utils, in utils/mount/mount_libmount.c there is a function

 is_vers4()

which
 /* returns: error = -1, success = 0 , unknown = 1 */

which seems odd to me... I would have chosen '1' for success (it is vers 4),
0 for failure (not vers 4), and maybe -1 for error (something went wrong).

This is used as follows:
			switch (is_vers4(cxt)) {
			case 0:
				/* We ignore the error from nfs_umount23.
				 * If the actual umount succeeds (in del_mtab),
				 * we don't want to signal an error, as that
				 * could cause /sbin/mount to retry!
				 */
				nfs_umount23(mnt_context_get_source(cxt), opts);
				break;
			case 1:			/* unknown */
				break;
			default:		/* error */
				goto err;
			}

so in the '0' (success, it is vers4) case we do nfs_umount23.  Odd.
In the '1' (unknown, so presumably vers2 or 3) we don't.  Ever.  Very odd.

So we don't currently send MOUNT_UMNT requests for v2 or v3.
We don't for v4 either because nfs_umount_do_umnt contains:

	/* Skip UMNT call for vers=4 mounts */
	if (nfs_pmap.pm_vers == 4)
		return EX_SUCCESS;

so maybe is_vers4 isn't needed?

Looks like something needs to be fixed here but I'm not entirely sure what.
Karel??

BTW Steve, Karel's "[PATCH] umount.nfs: ignore non-nfs filesystems"
which appears in email:

From: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>, NFS <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] umount.nfs: restore correct error status when umount fails.
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 18:44:20 +0200

hasn't been applied, but probably should be.

Thanks,
NeilBrown


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2012-07-31  6:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-31  6:58 NeilBrown [this message]
2012-07-31  9:58 ` nfs-utils: Something is wrong in is_vers4() Karel Zak
2012-07-31 17:04 ` Steve Dickson
2012-07-31 18:37   ` Karel Zak
2012-08-01 15:22     ` Steve Dickson
2012-08-02  0:21       ` NeilBrown
2012-08-06 14:21         ` Steve Dickson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120731165842.08017d60@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=SteveD@redhat.com \
    --cc=kzak@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).