From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>, Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
Cc: NFS <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: nfs-utils: Something is wrong in is_vers4()
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:58:42 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120731165842.08017d60@notabene.brown> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1645 bytes --]
in nfs-utils, in utils/mount/mount_libmount.c there is a function
is_vers4()
which
/* returns: error = -1, success = 0 , unknown = 1 */
which seems odd to me... I would have chosen '1' for success (it is vers 4),
0 for failure (not vers 4), and maybe -1 for error (something went wrong).
This is used as follows:
switch (is_vers4(cxt)) {
case 0:
/* We ignore the error from nfs_umount23.
* If the actual umount succeeds (in del_mtab),
* we don't want to signal an error, as that
* could cause /sbin/mount to retry!
*/
nfs_umount23(mnt_context_get_source(cxt), opts);
break;
case 1: /* unknown */
break;
default: /* error */
goto err;
}
so in the '0' (success, it is vers4) case we do nfs_umount23. Odd.
In the '1' (unknown, so presumably vers2 or 3) we don't. Ever. Very odd.
So we don't currently send MOUNT_UMNT requests for v2 or v3.
We don't for v4 either because nfs_umount_do_umnt contains:
/* Skip UMNT call for vers=4 mounts */
if (nfs_pmap.pm_vers == 4)
return EX_SUCCESS;
so maybe is_vers4 isn't needed?
Looks like something needs to be fixed here but I'm not entirely sure what.
Karel??
BTW Steve, Karel's "[PATCH] umount.nfs: ignore non-nfs filesystems"
which appears in email:
From: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>, NFS <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] umount.nfs: restore correct error status when umount fails.
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 18:44:20 +0200
hasn't been applied, but probably should be.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2012-07-31 6:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-31 6:58 NeilBrown [this message]
2012-07-31 9:58 ` nfs-utils: Something is wrong in is_vers4() Karel Zak
2012-07-31 17:04 ` Steve Dickson
2012-07-31 18:37 ` Karel Zak
2012-08-01 15:22 ` Steve Dickson
2012-08-02 0:21 ` NeilBrown
2012-08-06 14:21 ` Steve Dickson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120731165842.08017d60@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=SteveD@redhat.com \
--cc=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).