linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devel@openvz.org, neilb@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] SUNRPC: protect service sockets lists during per-net shutdown
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:06:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120821190646.GF16497@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120816192902.GB4385@fieldses.org>

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 03:29:03PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> Looking back at this:
> 
> 	- adding the sv_lock looks like the right thing to do anyway
> 	  independent of containers, because svc_age_temp_xprts may
> 	  still be running.

This is what I've been testing with.

Or alternatively if you'd rather strip out the other stuff from your
patch I could take that instead.

--b.

commit 719f8bcc883e7992615f4d5625922e24995e2d98
Author: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon Aug 13 17:03:00 2012 -0400

    svcrpc: fix xpt_list traversal locking on shutdown
    
    Server threads are not running at this point, but svc_age_temp_xprts
    still may be, so we need this locking.
    
    Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
index bac973a..e1810b9 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
@@ -917,16 +917,18 @@ void svc_close_xprt(struct svc_xprt *xprt)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(svc_close_xprt);
 
-static void svc_close_list(struct list_head *xprt_list, struct net *net)
+static void svc_close_list(struct svc_serv *serv, struct list_head *xprt_list, struct net *net)
 {
 	struct svc_xprt *xprt;
 
+	spin_lock(&serv->sv_lock);
 	list_for_each_entry(xprt, xprt_list, xpt_list) {
 		if (xprt->xpt_net != net)
 			continue;
 		set_bit(XPT_CLOSE, &xprt->xpt_flags);
 		set_bit(XPT_BUSY, &xprt->xpt_flags);
 	}
+	spin_unlock(&serv->sv_lock);
 }
 
 static void svc_clear_pools(struct svc_serv *serv, struct net *net)
@@ -949,24 +951,28 @@ static void svc_clear_pools(struct svc_serv *serv, struct net *net)
 	}
 }
 
-static void svc_clear_list(struct list_head *xprt_list, struct net *net)
+static void svc_clear_list(struct svc_serv *serv, struct list_head *xprt_list, struct net *net)
 {
 	struct svc_xprt *xprt;
 	struct svc_xprt *tmp;
+	LIST_HEAD(victims);
 
+	spin_lock(&serv->sv_lock);
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(xprt, tmp, xprt_list, xpt_list) {
 		if (xprt->xpt_net != net)
 			continue;
-		svc_delete_xprt(xprt);
+		list_move(&xprt->xpt_list, &victims);
 	}
-	list_for_each_entry(xprt, xprt_list, xpt_list)
-		BUG_ON(xprt->xpt_net == net);
+	spin_unlock(&serv->sv_lock);
+
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(xprt, tmp, &victims, xpt_list)
+		svc_delete_xprt(xprt);
 }
 
 void svc_close_net(struct svc_serv *serv, struct net *net)
 {
-	svc_close_list(&serv->sv_tempsocks, net);
-	svc_close_list(&serv->sv_permsocks, net);
+	svc_close_list(serv, &serv->sv_tempsocks, net);
+	svc_close_list(serv, &serv->sv_permsocks, net);
 
 	svc_clear_pools(serv, net);
 	/*
@@ -974,8 +980,8 @@ void svc_close_net(struct svc_serv *serv, struct net *net)
 	 * svc_xprt_enqueue will not add new entries without taking the
 	 * sp_lock and checking XPT_BUSY.
 	 */
-	svc_clear_list(&serv->sv_tempsocks, net);
-	svc_clear_list(&serv->sv_permsocks, net);
+	svc_clear_list(serv, &serv->sv_tempsocks, net);
+	svc_clear_list(serv, &serv->sv_permsocks, net);
 }
 
 /*

      parent reply	other threads:[~2012-08-21 19:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-03 12:58 [PATCH v3] SUNRPC: protect service sockets lists during per-net shutdown Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-07-24 19:40 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-07-31  5:28   ` NeilBrown
2012-08-16 19:29   ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-08-20 11:05     ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-08-20 14:56       ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-08-20 15:11         ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-08-20 16:58           ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-08-21  9:28             ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-08-21 12:25               ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-08-21 19:06     ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120821190646.GF16497@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=devel@openvz.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=skinsbursky@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).