From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
To: Guo Chao <yan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 02/13] vfs: pull ext4's double-i_mutex-locking into common code
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 09:49:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120906134947.GA13533@pad.fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120906025358.GA6679@yanx>
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 10:53:58AM +0800, Guo Chao wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 04:55:12PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * lock_two_nondirectories - release locks from lock_two_nondirectories()
> unlock_two_nondirectories
>
> > + * @inode1: first inode to unlock
> > + * @inode2: second inode to lock
> unlock
>
Both fixed, thanks!
--b.
commit d190216f0b6c4623f9c23e2c7fb2e2fa9009891f
Author: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Apr 18 15:16:33 2012 -0400
vfs: pull ext4's double-i_mutex-locking into common code
We want to do this elsewhere as well.
Also, compare pointers instead of inode numbers.
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
diff --git a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
index c5826c6..b87d94a 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
@@ -1086,19 +1086,7 @@ mext_inode_double_lock(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2)
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
- if (inode1 == inode2) {
- mutex_lock(&inode1->i_mutex);
- goto out;
- }
-
- if (inode1->i_ino < inode2->i_ino) {
- mutex_lock_nested(&inode1->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
- mutex_lock_nested(&inode2->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_CHILD);
- } else {
- mutex_lock_nested(&inode2->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
- mutex_lock_nested(&inode1->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_CHILD);
- }
-
+ lock_two_nondirectories(inode1, inode2);
out:
return ret;
}
@@ -1123,12 +1111,7 @@ mext_inode_double_unlock(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2)
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
- if (inode1)
- mutex_unlock(&inode1->i_mutex);
-
- if (inode2 && inode2 != inode1)
- mutex_unlock(&inode2->i_mutex);
-
+ unlock_two_nondirectories(inode1, inode2);
out:
return ret;
}
diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index ac8d904..275f571 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -969,6 +969,42 @@ void unlock_new_inode(struct inode *inode)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(unlock_new_inode);
/**
+ * lock_two_nondirectories - take two i_mutexes on non-directory objects
+ * @inode1: first inode to lock; must be non-NULL
+ * @inode2: second inode to lock; optional, may equal first or be NULL.
+ */
+void lock_two_nondirectories(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2)
+{
+ if (inode1 == inode2 || inode2 == NULL)
+ mutex_lock(&inode1->i_mutex);
+ else if (inode1 < inode2) {
+ mutex_lock_nested(&inode1->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
+ mutex_lock_nested(&inode2->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_CHILD);
+
+ } else {
+ mutex_lock_nested(&inode2->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
+ mutex_lock_nested(&inode1->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_CHILD);
+ }
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(lock_two_nondirectories);
+
+/**
+ * unlock_two_nondirectories - release locks from lock_two_nondirectories()
+ * @inode1: first inode to unlock
+ * @inode2: second inode to unlock
+ *
+ * Arguments must be same as those given to corresponding
+ * lock_two_nondirectories() call.
+ */
+void unlock_two_nondirectories(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2)
+{
+ mutex_unlock(&inode1->i_mutex);
+ if (inode2 && inode2 != inode1)
+ mutex_unlock(&inode2->i_mutex);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(unlock_two_nondirectories);
+
+/**
* iget5_locked - obtain an inode from a mounted file system
* @sb: super block of file system
* @hashval: hash value (usually inode number) to get
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index aa11047..a179b69 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -895,6 +895,9 @@ enum inode_i_mutex_lock_class
I_MUTEX_QUOTA
};
+void lock_two_nondirectories(struct inode *, struct inode*);
+void unlock_two_nondirectories(struct inode *, struct inode*);
+
/*
* NOTE: in a 32bit arch with a preemptable kernel and
* an UP compile the i_size_read/write must be atomic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-06 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-05 20:55 [RFC PATCH 00/13] Implement NFSv4 delegations, take 4 J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 01/13] gfs2: Get rid of I_MUTEX_QUOTA usage J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:59 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-06 14:27 ` Steven Whitehouse
2012-09-06 17:08 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 02/13] vfs: pull ext4's double-i_mutex-locking into common code J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-06 2:53 ` Guo Chao
2012-09-06 13:49 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 03/13] vfs: don't use PARENT/CHILD lock classes for non-directories J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 04/13] vfs: rename I_MUTEX_QUOTA now that it's not used for quotas J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 05/13] vfs: take i_mutex on renamed file J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-06 3:05 ` Guo Chao
2012-09-06 17:51 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-07 2:27 ` Guo Chao
2012-09-07 21:39 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-10 2:40 ` Guo Chao
2012-09-10 5:10 ` Ram Pai
2012-09-10 6:37 ` Guo Chao
2012-09-10 7:27 ` Ram Pai
2013-02-14 2:01 ` Al Viro
2012-09-10 14:35 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 06/13] locks: introduce new FL_DELEG lock flag J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 07/13] locks: implement delegations J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 08/13] namei: minor vfs_unlink cleanup J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 09/13] locks: break delegations on unlink J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 10/13] locks: helper functions for delegation breaking J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 11/13] locks: break delegations on rename J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 12/13] locks: break delegations on link J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 21:02 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-06 11:01 ` Jeff Layton
2012-09-06 13:33 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 13/13] locks: break delegations on any attribute modification J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120906134947.GA13533@pad.fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@redhat.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=yan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).