From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/13] gfs2: Get rid of I_MUTEX_QUOTA usage
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 13:08:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120906170806.GA21736@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346941666.2728.17.camel@menhir>
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:27:46PM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 16:59 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 04:55:11PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> > >
> > > GFS2 uses i_mutex on its system quota inode to synchronize writes to
> > > quota file. Since this is an internal inode to GFS2 (not part of directory
> > > hiearchy or visible by user) we are safe to define locking rules for it. So
> > > let's just get it its own locking class to make it clear.
> >
> > By the way, Steve, is there any reason you haven't taken this through
> > the gfs2 tree?
> >
> > --b.
> >
> I don't remember now, but I've pushed it into my tree for the next merge
> window,
Thanks!
--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-06 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-05 20:55 [RFC PATCH 00/13] Implement NFSv4 delegations, take 4 J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 01/13] gfs2: Get rid of I_MUTEX_QUOTA usage J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:59 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-06 14:27 ` Steven Whitehouse
2012-09-06 17:08 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 02/13] vfs: pull ext4's double-i_mutex-locking into common code J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-06 2:53 ` Guo Chao
2012-09-06 13:49 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 03/13] vfs: don't use PARENT/CHILD lock classes for non-directories J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 04/13] vfs: rename I_MUTEX_QUOTA now that it's not used for quotas J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 05/13] vfs: take i_mutex on renamed file J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-06 3:05 ` Guo Chao
2012-09-06 17:51 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-07 2:27 ` Guo Chao
2012-09-07 21:39 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-10 2:40 ` Guo Chao
2012-09-10 5:10 ` Ram Pai
2012-09-10 6:37 ` Guo Chao
2012-09-10 7:27 ` Ram Pai
2013-02-14 2:01 ` Al Viro
2012-09-10 14:35 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 06/13] locks: introduce new FL_DELEG lock flag J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 07/13] locks: implement delegations J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 08/13] namei: minor vfs_unlink cleanup J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 09/13] locks: break delegations on unlink J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 10/13] locks: helper functions for delegation breaking J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 11/13] locks: break delegations on rename J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 12/13] locks: break delegations on link J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 21:02 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-06 11:01 ` Jeff Layton
2012-09-06 13:33 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 13/13] locks: break delegations on any attribute modification J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120906170806.GA21736@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=bfields@redhat.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=swhiteho@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).