From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: NFS <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Inconsistency when mounting a directory that 'world' cannot access.
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 13:46:29 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121003134629.72557522@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121002143334.GA1435@fieldses.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1484 bytes --]
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 10:33:34 -0400 "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
wrote:
> I guess you're right. So it starts to sound more like: "you have a
> confusing setup. Your export configuration says one thing, and your
> filesystem permissions say another. Under NFSv3 the confusion didn't
> matter, but now it does--time to fix it."
>
That's the best I could come to - I'm glad to have it confirmed. Thanks!
It is unfortunate that Linux NFS uses an anon credential to mount when krb5
is in use, and uses 'root' when auth_sys is used (which might be anon if
"root_squash" is active, but might not).
I wonder if it would work to use auth_none for the mount-time lookup, just
for consistency..
Is the following appropriate? Is there somewhere better to put this caveat?
Thanks,
NeilBrown
diff --git a/utils/exportfs/exports.man b/utils/exportfs/exports.man
index bc1de73..91e4b9c 100644
--- a/utils/exportfs/exports.man
+++ b/utils/exportfs/exports.man
@@ -126,6 +126,10 @@ will be enforced only for access using flavors listed in the immediately
preceding sec= option. The only options that are permitted to vary in
this way are ro, rw, no_root_squash, root_squash, and all_squash.
.PP
+When RPCSEC_GSS is used with NFSv4, a client will only be able to mount a
+directory if that directory and all its ancestors give eXecute access
+to "world".
+.PP
.SS General Options
.BR exportfs
understands the following export options:
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-03 3:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-18 1:23 Inconsistency when mounting a directory that 'world' cannot access NeilBrown
2012-10-01 15:43 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-02 2:38 ` NeilBrown
2012-10-02 14:33 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-03 3:46 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2012-10-03 15:13 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-03 15:48 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-10-03 16:27 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-03 22:46 ` NeilBrown
2012-10-04 16:07 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-08 6:03 ` NeilBrown
2012-10-08 11:42 ` Steve Dickson
2012-10-08 12:20 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-09 0:30 ` NeilBrown
2012-10-08 12:19 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-08 13:54 ` Malahal Naineni
2012-10-08 14:18 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-08 15:26 ` Malahal Naineni
2012-10-09 0:33 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121003134629.72557522@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).