From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@intellique.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFS daemon statistics in /proc/net/rpc/nfsd
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 16:28:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121005202845.GB30139@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121005184856.4472a72e@harpe.intellique.com>
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 06:48:56PM +0200, Emmanuel Florac wrote:
>
> I noticed a long time ago that the thread information in
> /proc/net/rpc/nfsd isn't updated anymore since somewhere between the
> 2.629 (information present) and 2.6.32 (information missing). It's
> quite easy to check:
>
> # grep th /proc/net/rpc/nfsd
> th 8 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
>
> All values are perpetually at zero. Unsurprising, because the
> update_thread_usage function in fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c isn't present anymore.
>
> I can't find any information about why this information was dropped;
The trick to answering a question like this is:
git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
cd linux
got log -p fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
Then type "/update_thread_usage" to search for references to that
function.
The changelog on the commit that removed it follows.
> I personnally found it useful to tune properly the number of nfs
> threads on loaded servers. Did it use up too many resources? In that
> case, could there be a mechanism to enable or disable therad
> information gathering, for instance through writing to some /proc
> file?
There's a file /proc/fs/nfsd/pool_stats that should be useful for the
same purpose; see the discussion in
Documentation/filesystems/nfs/knfsd-stats.txt.
(But note the overloads-avoided number mentioned there had to be removed
due to reports of a performance regression; we should figure out what to
do about that.)
--b.
commit 8bbfa9f3889b643fc7de82c0c761ef17097f8faf
Author: Greg Banks <gnb@sgi.com>
Date: Tue Jan 13 21:26:34 2009 +1100
knfsd: remove the nfsd thread busy histogram
Stop gathering the data that feeds the 'th' line in /proc/net/rpc/nfsd
because the questionable data provided is not worth the scalability
impact of calculating it. Instead, always report zeroes. The current
approach suffers from three major issues:
1. update_thread_usage() increments buckets by call service
time or call arrival time...in jiffies. On lightly loaded
machines, call service times are usually < 1 jiffy; on
heavily loaded machines call arrival times will be << 1 jiffy.
So a large portion of the updates to the buckets are rounded
down to zero, and the histogram is undercounting.
2. As seen previously on the nfs mailing list, the format in which
the histogram is presented is cryptic, difficult to explain,
and difficult to use.
3. Updating the histogram requires taking a global spinlock and
dirtying the global variables nfsd_last_call, nfsd_busy, and
nfsdstats *twice* on every RPC call, which is a significant
scaling limitation.
Testing on a 4 CPU 4 NIC Altix using 4 IRIX clients each doing
1K streaming reads at full line rate, shows the stats update code
(inlined into nfsd()) takes about 1.7% of each CPU. This patch drops
the contribution from nfsd() into the profile noise.
This patch is a forward-ported version of knfsd-remove-nfsd-threadstats
which has been shipping in the SGI "Enhanced NFS" product since 2006.
In that time, exactly one customer has noticed that the threadstats
were missing. It has been previously posted:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.nfs/10376
and more recently requested to be posted again.
Signed-off-by: Greg Banks <gnb@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-05 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-05 16:48 NFS daemon statistics in /proc/net/rpc/nfsd Emmanuel Florac
2012-10-05 18:42 ` Jim Rees
2012-10-05 20:28 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2012-10-05 21:03 ` Emmanuel Florac
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121005202845.GB30139@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=eflorac@intellique.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).