linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
Cc: "Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devel@openvz.org" <devel@openvz.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] SUNRPC: set desired file system root before connecting local transports
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 16:01:13 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121114210112.GA539@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50A0B562.2090807@parallels.com>

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:37:54PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> 07.11.2012 22:33, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
> >On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 08:36:05AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> >>On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 08:10:18AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 08:07:06AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> >>>>So you're worried that a bug in the nfs code could modify the root and
> >>>>then not restore it?
> >>>
> >>>At least the link you pointed to earlier never sets it back.
> >>
> >>This? http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1259986/focus=47687
> >>
> >>	+	get_fs_root(current->fs, &root);
> >>	+	set_fs_root(current->fs, &transport->root);
> >>	+
> >>	 	status = xs_local_finish_connecting(xprt, sock);
> >>	+
> >>	+	set_fs_root(current->fs, &root);
> >>	+	path_put(&root);
> >>
> >>>Instead
> >>>of messing with it I'd rather have the sunrpc code use vfs_path_lookup
> >>>and not care about current->fs->root at all.
> >>
> >>The annoyance is that the lookup happens somewhere lower down in the
> >>networking code (net/unix/af_unix.c:unix_find_other, I think).  So we'd
> >>need some new (internal) API.  We'd likely be the only user of that new
> >>API.
> >
> >So, if the only drawback is really just the risk of introducing a bug
> >that leaves the fs_root changed--the above seems simple enough for that
> >not to be a great risk, right?
> >
> 
> If we unshare rpciod fs struct (which is exported already), then we

I'm not sure what you mean by that.  Do workqueues actually have their
own dedicated set of associated tasks?  I thought all workqueues shared
a common pool of tasks these days.

> won't affect other kthreads by root swapping.
> But would be great to hear Trond's opinion about this approach.
> 
> Trond, could you tell us your feeling about all this?

I think it's often easier to get people to comment on an actual patch,
and this one would be quite short, so try that....

--b.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-14 21:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-08 10:56 [PATCH v3] SUNRPC: set desired file system root before connecting local transports Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-10-09 19:35 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-09 19:49   ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-10-09 20:20     ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-10-09 22:31       ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-09 22:47         ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-10-10  1:23           ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-10 10:32             ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-10-26 17:52               ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-10  2:00           ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-10-10  5:09             ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-10-10  5:03           ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-11-06 10:14   ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-11-06 12:06     ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-11-06 12:11       ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-11-06 13:05         ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-11-06 12:40       ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-11-06 13:07         ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-11-06 13:10           ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-11-06 13:36             ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-11-07 18:33               ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-11-12  8:37                 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-11-14 21:01                   ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2012-11-14 21:36                     ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-11-14 21:42                       ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-11-14 21:51                         ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-11-14 21:54                           ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-11-15  6:14                             ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-15 13:34                               ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-11-15 18:58                                 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-11-15  8:35                     ` Stanislav Kinsbursky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121114210112.GA539@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=devel@openvz.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=skinsbursky@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).