From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
NFS <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NFSv4 cannot unmount ESTALE directories (in some cases).
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 03:09:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130121030940.GS4939@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130121134859.24fbd103@notabene.brown>
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 01:48:59PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> If you use NFSv4 to "mount server:/foo/bar /mnt", then "rm -r" /foo/bar on the
> server, then accesses to /mnt will naturally return ESTALE.
>
> Unfortunately "umount /mnt" will also return ESTALE and leave the stale
> directory mounted. Adding "-l" or "-f" to "umount" doesn't help.
>
> The problem is that nfs_lookup_revalidate fails. As the mountpoint is never
> not accessed by a lookup (after the initial mount) it seems a bit pointless
> calling d_revalidate in this case ... by maybe not.
>
> I can make the problem go away by testing for LOOKUP_JUMP and having
> nfs_lookup_revalidate never fail if that flag it set (for a directory).
> However I cannot easily tell if this is an elegant solution of an ugly hack,
The latter. Definitely.
> and am hoping that someone who understands revalidation and LOOKUP_JUMPED
> better than I (who only discovered the latter today) could provide advice.
>
> Al? Trond? Should I make this into a formal patch submission, or is there
> a better way?
I really suspect that mountpoint crossing on umount ought to be done
differently. I'll need to play with possible variants a bit before I can
offer any replacement though...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-21 3:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-21 2:48 NFSv4 cannot unmount ESTALE directories (in some cases) NeilBrown
2013-01-21 3:09 ` Al Viro [this message]
2013-02-02 6:28 ` dE .
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130121030940.GS4939@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).