From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] SUNRPC: rework cache upcall to avoid NFSd root swapping
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:00:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130130230052.GB16158@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130115080402.2996.74320.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:09:23AM +0300, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> The main idea of this patch set is to call cache request not on kthread
> upcall, but on userspace daemon cache_read call. This fixes the problem with
> gaining of wrong dentry path after calling d_path() in kthread root context
> (svc_export_request() callback), which always work in init root context, but
> containers can work in "root jail" - i.e. have it's own nested root.
Sorry for the delay. This looks good to me--committing pending some
testing.
What's left now for basic containerized nfsd support?
--b.
>
> The following series implements...
>
> ---
>
> Stanislav Kinsbursky (4):
> SUNRPC: introduce cache_detail->cache_request callback
> SUNRPC: remove cache_detail->cache_upcall callback
> SUNRPC: remove "cache_request" argument in sunrpc_cache_pipe_upcall() function
> SUNRPC: move cache_detail->cache_request callback call to cache_read()
>
>
> fs/nfs/dns_resolve.c | 2 +-
> fs/nfsd/export.c | 14 ++----------
> fs/nfsd/nfs4idmap.c | 16 ++-----------
> include/linux/sunrpc/cache.h | 11 +++------
> net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c | 8 +------
> net/sunrpc/cache.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> net/sunrpc/svcauth_unix.c | 14 ++----------
> 7 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-30 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-15 8:09 [RFC PATCH 0/4] SUNRPC: rework cache upcall to avoid NFSd root swapping Stanislav Kinsbursky
2013-01-15 8:09 ` [PATCH 1/4] SUNRPC: introduce cache_detail->cache_request callback Stanislav Kinsbursky
2013-01-15 8:09 ` [PATCH 2/4] SUNRPC: remove cache_detail->cache_upcall callback Stanislav Kinsbursky
2013-02-04 16:50 ` Jeff Layton
2013-02-04 17:15 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-05 5:37 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2013-01-15 8:09 ` [PATCH 3/4] SUNRPC: remove "cache_request" argument in sunrpc_cache_pipe_upcall() function Stanislav Kinsbursky
2013-01-15 8:09 ` [PATCH 4/4] SUNRPC: move cache_detail->cache_request callback call to cache_read() Stanislav Kinsbursky
2013-01-30 23:00 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2013-01-31 5:15 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] SUNRPC: rework cache upcall to avoid NFSd root swapping Stanislav Kinsbursky
2013-02-04 10:22 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130130230052.GB16158@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=skinsbursky@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox