public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] nfsd: duplicate reply cache overhaul
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:56:04 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130204155604.GC815@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359983887-28535-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com>

On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 08:17:59AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> This is the second posting of the remaining unmerged patches in this
> set. There are a number of differences from the first set:
> 
> - The bug in the checksum patch has been fixed.
> 
> - A hard cap on the number of DRC entries is retained, but it's larger
>   than the original cap, and scales with the amount of low memory in
>   the machine.
> 
> - A shrinker is still registered, but it will now only free entries
>   that are expired or are over the max number of entries.
> 
> Our QA group has been reporting on and off for the last several years
> about occasional failures in testing, especially on UDP. When we go to
> look at traces, we see a missing reply from a server on a non-idempotent
> request. The client then retransmits the request and the server tries to
> redo it instead of just sending the DRC entry.
> 
> With an instrumented kernel on the server and a synthetic reproducer, we
> found that it's quite easy to hammer the server so fast that DRC entries
> get flushed out long before a retransmit can come in.
> 
> This patchset is a first pass at fixing this. Instead of simply keeping
> a cache of the last 1024 entries, it allows nfsd to grow and shrink the
> DRC dynamically.
> 
> While most of us will probably say "so what" when it comes to UDP
> failures, it's a potential problem on connected transports as well. I'm
> also inclined to try and fix things that screw up the people that are
> helping us test our code.
> 
> I'd like to see this merged for 3.9 if possible...

These look fine, thanks.  Applying pending some testing.

--b.

> 
> Jeff Layton (8):
>   nfsd: always move DRC entries to the end of LRU list when updating
>     timestamp
>   nfsd: track the number of DRC entries in the cache
>   nfsd: dynamically allocate DRC entries
>   nfsd: remove the cache_disabled flag
>   nfsd: when updating an entry with RC_NOCACHE, just free it
>   nfsd: add recurring workqueue job to clean the cache
>   nfsd: register a shrinker for DRC cache entries
>   nfsd: keep a checksum of the first 256 bytes of request
> 
>  fs/nfsd/cache.h    |   5 +
>  fs/nfsd/nfscache.c | 271 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  2 files changed, 209 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 1.7.11.7
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-04 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-04 13:17 [PATCH v2 0/8] nfsd: duplicate reply cache overhaul Jeff Layton
2013-02-04 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] nfsd: always move DRC entries to the end of LRU list when updating timestamp Jeff Layton
2013-02-04 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] nfsd: track the number of DRC entries in the cache Jeff Layton
2013-02-04 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] nfsd: dynamically allocate DRC entries Jeff Layton
2013-02-04 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] nfsd: remove the cache_disabled flag Jeff Layton
2013-02-04 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] nfsd: when updating an entry with RC_NOCACHE, just free it Jeff Layton
2013-02-04 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] nfsd: add recurring workqueue job to clean the cache Jeff Layton
2013-02-04 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] nfsd: register a shrinker for DRC cache entries Jeff Layton
2013-02-04 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] nfsd: keep a checksum of the first 256 bytes of request Jeff Layton
2013-02-04 15:54   ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-04 16:16     ` Jeff Layton
2013-02-04 20:20   ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-05 14:55     ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-05 15:51       ` Jeff Layton
2013-02-04 15:56 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2013-02-04 18:07 ` [PATCH 9/8] nfsd: handle arbitrary page array layouts in nfsd_cache_crc Jeff Layton
2013-02-04 18:18   ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-05 15:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] nfsd: duplicate reply cache overhaul J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-05 15:58   ` Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130204155604.GC815@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox