From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>,
"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"chuck.lever@oracle.com" <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
"simo@redhat.com" <simo@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] SUNRPC: make AF_LOCAL connect synchronous
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 23:06:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130226040639.GA30088@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FA345DA4F4AE44899BD2B03EEEC2FA9235DAA19@SACEXCMBX04-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
It doesn't appear that anyone actually needs to connect asynchronously.
Also, using a workqueue for the connect means we lose the namespace
information from the original process. This is a problem since there's
no way to explicitly pass in a filesystem namespace for resolution of an
AF_LOCAL address.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
---
net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 08:42:14PM +0000, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 15:36 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 08:02:30PM +0000, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> > > A 5 minute msleep() is probably a bit excessive. Making it interruptible
> > > might help, but ...
> > > That does however raise the issue of why we need exponential back off
> > > here? An AF_LOCAL connect call is pretty efficient.
> >
> > And the only excuse for the connect not succeeding is, what, rpcbind
> > just crashed or something? In which case I think our only
> > responsibility is just not to spin furiously. How about just something
> > like
> >
> > ret = xs_local_setup_socket(transport);
> > if (ret && !RPC_IS_SOFTCONN(task))
> > msleep_interruptible(1000);
> > return;
>
> This general approach works for me...
>
> > ?
> >
> > Or we could keep the same exponential timeout logic and just adjust the
> > min/max.
> >
> > I have no strong opinions here....
>
> I'm fine with just using a fixed timeout, as long as it is not too
> short. 15 seconds, perhaps?
OK, just plugging in 15s--does this look OK? If so, could you take it
for 3.9?
The rest of the gss-proxy work will have to wait for 3.10, I think, but
this seems simple enough and also fills in one last gap in the nfsd
containerization work.--b.
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
index bbc0915..4dc8eb2 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
@@ -1866,13 +1866,9 @@ static int xs_local_finish_connecting(struct rpc_xprt *xprt,
* @xprt: RPC transport to connect
* @transport: socket transport to connect
* @create_sock: function to create a socket of the correct type
- *
- * Invoked by a work queue tasklet.
*/
-static void xs_local_setup_socket(struct work_struct *work)
+static int xs_local_setup_socket(struct sock_xprt *transport)
{
- struct sock_xprt *transport =
- container_of(work, struct sock_xprt, connect_worker.work);
struct rpc_xprt *xprt = &transport->xprt;
struct socket *sock;
int status = -EIO;
@@ -1917,6 +1913,31 @@ out:
xprt_clear_connecting(xprt);
xprt_wake_pending_tasks(xprt, status);
current->flags &= ~PF_FSTRANS;
+ return status;
+}
+
+static void xs_local_connect(struct rpc_task *task)
+{
+ struct rpc_xprt *xprt = task->tk_xprt;
+ struct sock_xprt *transport = container_of(xprt, struct sock_xprt, xprt);
+ int ret;
+
+ if (RPC_IS_ASYNC(task)) {
+ /*
+ * We want the AF_LOCAL connect to be resolved in the
+ * filesystem namespace of the process making the rpc
+ * call. Thus we connect synchronously.
+ *
+ * If we want to support asynchronous AF_LOCAL calls,
+ * we'll need to figure out how to pass a namespace to
+ * connect.
+ */
+ rpc_exit(task, -ENOTCONN);
+ return;
+ }
+ ret = xs_local_setup_socket(transport);
+ if (ret && !RPC_IS_SOFTCONN(task))
+ msleep_interruptible(15000);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SUNRPC_SWAP
@@ -2454,7 +2475,7 @@ static struct rpc_xprt_ops xs_local_ops = {
.alloc_slot = xprt_alloc_slot,
.rpcbind = xs_local_rpcbind,
.set_port = xs_local_set_port,
- .connect = xs_connect,
+ .connect = xs_local_connect,
.buf_alloc = rpc_malloc,
.buf_free = rpc_free,
.send_request = xs_local_send_request,
@@ -2627,8 +2648,6 @@ static struct rpc_xprt *xs_setup_local(struct xprt_create *args)
goto out_err;
}
xprt_set_bound(xprt);
- INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&transport->connect_worker,
- xs_local_setup_socket);
xs_format_peer_addresses(xprt, "local", RPCBIND_NETID_LOCAL);
break;
default:
--
1.7.11.7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-26 4:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-21 16:38 [PATCH 0/6] gss-proxy upcall for nfsd J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-21 16:38 ` [PATCH 1/6] SUNRPC: make AF_LOCAL connect synchronous J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-21 18:17 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-02-21 19:48 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-21 20:02 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-02-21 20:36 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-21 20:42 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-02-26 4:06 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2013-02-21 16:38 ` [PATCH 2/6] SUNRPC: attempt AF_LOCAL connect on setup J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-21 16:38 ` [PATCH 3/6] SUNRPC: no idle timeout for AF_LOCAL sockets J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-21 16:38 ` [PATCH 4/6] SUNRPC: conditionally return endtime from import_sec_context J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-21 16:38 ` [PATCH 5/6] SUNRPC: Add RPC based upcall mechanism for RPCGSS auth J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-21 18:35 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-02-21 19:58 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-21 21:37 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-04-12 18:11 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-04-12 18:21 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-04-12 18:33 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-21 16:38 ` [PATCH 6/6] SUNRPC: Use gssproxy upcall for server RPCGSS authentication J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-21 21:01 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-26 13:27 ` Simo Sorce
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130226040639.GA30088@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=bfields@redhat.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).