linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@ts.fujitsu.com>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] sunrpc/cache: remove races with queuing an upcall.
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 17:36:42 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130226063641.6063.80045.stgit@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130226063637.6063.34934.stgit@notabene.brown>

We currently queue an upcall after setting CACHE_PENDING,
and dequeue after clearing CACHE_PENDING.
So a request should only be present when CACHE_PENDING is set.

However we don't combine the test and the enqueue/dequeue in
a protected region, so it is possible (if unlikely) for a race
to result in a request being queued without CACHE_PENDING set,
or a request to be absent despite CACHE_PENDING.

So: include a test for CACHE_PENDING inside the regions of
enqueue and dequeue where queue_lock is held, and abort
the operation if the value is not as expected.

With this, it perfectly safe and correct to:
 - call cache_dequeue() if and only if we have just
   cleared CACHE_PENDING
 - call sunrpc_cache_pipe_upcall() (via cache_make_upcall)
   if and only if we have just set CACHE_PENDING.

Reported-by: Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@ts.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
 net/sunrpc/cache.c |   16 ++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sunrpc/cache.c b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
index 9afa439..b48c8ef 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/cache.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
@@ -1022,6 +1022,9 @@ static void cache_dequeue(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head *ch)
 			struct cache_request *cr = container_of(cq, struct cache_request, q);
 			if (cr->item != ch)
 				continue;
+			if (test_bit(CACHE_PENDING, &ch->flags))
+				/* Lost a race and it is pending again */
+				break;
 			if (cr->readers != 0)
 				continue;
 			list_del(&cr->q.list);
@@ -1151,6 +1154,7 @@ int sunrpc_cache_pipe_upcall(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head *h,
 	struct cache_request *crq;
 	char *bp;
 	int len;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (!cache_listeners_exist(detail)) {
 		warn_no_listener(detail);
@@ -1182,10 +1186,18 @@ int sunrpc_cache_pipe_upcall(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head *h,
 	crq->len = PAGE_SIZE - len;
 	crq->readers = 0;
 	spin_lock(&queue_lock);
-	list_add_tail(&crq->q.list, &detail->queue);
+	if (test_bit(CACHE_PENDING, &h->flags))
+		list_add_tail(&crq->q.list, &detail->queue);
+	else
+		/* Lost a race, no longer PENDING, so don't enqueue */
+		ret = -EAGAIN;
 	spin_unlock(&queue_lock);
 	wake_up(&queue_wait);
-	return 0;
+	if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
+		kfree(buf);
+		kfree(crq);
+	}
+	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sunrpc_cache_pipe_upcall);
 



  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-26  6:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-26  6:36 [PATCH 0/2] two fixes for races in SUNRPC NeilBrown
2013-02-26  6:36 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2013-02-26  6:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] sunrpc/cache: use cache_fresh_unlocked consistently and correctly NeilBrown
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-02-26 14:02 [PATCH 1/2] sunrpc/cache: remove races with queuing an upcall Bodo Stroesser
     [not found] <61eb00$3fkshf@dgate20u.abg.fsc.net>
2013-02-27 23:24 ` NeilBrown
2013-03-04  6:09 [PATCH 0/2] two fixes for races in SUNRPC. - Take 2 NeilBrown
2013-03-04  6:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] sunrpc/cache: remove races with queuing an upcall NeilBrown
2013-03-04 15:57 Bodo Stroesser
2013-03-05 13:57 Bodo Stroesser
2013-03-05 15:07 Bodo Stroesser
     [not found] <61eb00$3g8j4e@dgate20u.abg.fsc.net>
2013-03-13  5:58 ` NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130226063641.6063.80045.stgit@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=bstroesser@ts.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).