From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@ts.fujitsu.com>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] sunrpc/cache: remove races with queuing an upcall.
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 17:09:32 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130304060932.1352.33927.stgit@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130304060801.1352.97857.stgit@notabene.brown>
We currently queue an upcall after setting CACHE_PENDING,
and dequeue after clearing CACHE_PENDING.
So a request should only be present when CACHE_PENDING is set.
However we don't combine the test and the enqueue/dequeue in
a protected region, so it is possible (if unlikely) for a race
to result in a request being queued without CACHE_PENDING set,
or a request to be absent despite CACHE_PENDING.
So: include a test for CACHE_PENDING inside the regions of
enqueue and dequeue where queue_lock is held, and abort
the operation if the value is not as expected.
Also remove the 'return' from cache_dequeue() to ensure it always
removes all entries: As there is no locking between setting
CACHE_PENDING and calling sunrpc_cache_pipe_upcall it is not
inconceivable for some other thread to clear CACHE_PENDING and then
someone else to set it can call sunrpc_cache_pipe_upcall, both before
the original thread completed the call.
With this, it perfectly safe and correct to:
- call cache_dequeue() if and only if we have just
cleared CACHE_PENDING
- call sunrpc_cache_pipe_upcall() (via cache_make_upcall)
if and only if we have just set CACHE_PENDING.
Reported-by: Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@ts.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
net/sunrpc/cache.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/cache.c b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
index 9afa439..0400a92 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/cache.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
@@ -1022,6 +1022,9 @@ static void cache_dequeue(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head *ch)
struct cache_request *cr = container_of(cq, struct cache_request, q);
if (cr->item != ch)
continue;
+ if (test_bit(CACHE_PENDING, &ch->flags))
+ /* Lost a race and it is pending again */
+ break;
if (cr->readers != 0)
continue;
list_del(&cr->q.list);
@@ -1029,7 +1032,6 @@ static void cache_dequeue(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head *ch)
cache_put(cr->item, detail);
kfree(cr->buf);
kfree(cr);
- return;
}
spin_unlock(&queue_lock);
}
@@ -1151,6 +1153,7 @@ int sunrpc_cache_pipe_upcall(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head *h,
struct cache_request *crq;
char *bp;
int len;
+ int ret = 0;
if (!cache_listeners_exist(detail)) {
warn_no_listener(detail);
@@ -1182,10 +1185,18 @@ int sunrpc_cache_pipe_upcall(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head *h,
crq->len = PAGE_SIZE - len;
crq->readers = 0;
spin_lock(&queue_lock);
- list_add_tail(&crq->q.list, &detail->queue);
+ if (test_bit(CACHE_PENDING, &h->flags))
+ list_add_tail(&crq->q.list, &detail->queue);
+ else
+ /* Lost a race, no longer PENDING, so don't enqueue */
+ ret = -EAGAIN;
spin_unlock(&queue_lock);
wake_up(&queue_wait);
- return 0;
+ if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
+ kfree(buf);
+ kfree(crq);
+ }
+ return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sunrpc_cache_pipe_upcall);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-04 6:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-04 6:09 [PATCH 0/2] two fixes for races in SUNRPC. - Take 2 NeilBrown
2013-03-04 6:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] sunrpc/cache: use cache_fresh_unlocked consistently and correctly NeilBrown
2013-03-04 6:09 ` NeilBrown [this message]
[not found] <61eb00$3g8j4e@dgate20u.abg.fsc.net>
2013-03-13 5:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] sunrpc/cache: remove races with queuing an upcall NeilBrown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-03-05 15:07 Bodo Stroesser
2013-03-05 13:57 Bodo Stroesser
2013-03-04 15:57 Bodo Stroesser
[not found] <61eb00$3fkshf@dgate20u.abg.fsc.net>
2013-02-27 23:24 ` NeilBrown
2013-02-26 14:02 Bodo Stroesser
2013-02-26 6:36 [PATCH 0/2] two fixes for races in SUNRPC NeilBrown
2013-02-26 6:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] sunrpc/cache: remove races with queuing an upcall NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130304060932.1352.33927.stgit@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=bstroesser@ts.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).