linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: James Vanns <james.vanns@framestore.com>
Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Where in the server code is fsinfo rtpref calculated?
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 10:15:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130515141508.GH16811@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1045951723.19965005.1368625362930.JavaMail.root@framestore.com>

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 02:42:42PM +0100, James Vanns wrote:
> > fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c:nfsd_get_default_maxblksize() is probably a good
> > starting point.  Its caller, nfsd_create_serv(), calls
> > svc_create_pooled() with the result that's calculated.
> 
> Hmm. If I've read this section of code correctly, it seems to me
> that on most modern NFS servers (using TCP as the transport) the default
> and preferred blocksize negotiated with clients will almost always be
> 1MB - the maximum RPC payload. The nfsd_get_default_maxblksize() function
> seems obsolete for modern 64-bit servers with at least 4G of RAM as it'll
> always prefer this upper bound instead of any value calculated according to
> available RAM.

Well, "obsolete" is an odd way to put it--the code is still expected to
work on smaller machines.

Arguments welcome about the defaults, though I wonder whether it would
be better to be doing this sort of calculation in user space.

> For what it's worth (not sure if I specified this) I'm running kernel 2.6.32.
> 
> Anyway, this file/function appears to set the default *max* blocksize. I haven't 
> read all the related code yet, but does the preferred block size derive 
> from this maximum too?

See:

> > For fsinfo see fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c:nfsd3_proc_fsinfo, which uses
> > svc_max_payload().

I'm not sure what the history is behind that logic, though.

--b.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-15 14:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-14 11:17 Where in the server code is fsinfo rtpref calculated? James Vanns
2013-05-14 22:01 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-05-15  9:21   ` James Vanns
2013-05-15 13:42   ` James Vanns
2013-05-15 14:15     ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2013-05-15 14:34       ` James Vanns
2013-05-15 14:47         ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-05-15 15:20           ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-05-15 16:32           ` James Vanns
2013-05-15 17:42             ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-05-17 11:43               ` James Vanns
2013-05-17 13:56                 ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130515141508.GH16811@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=james.vanns@framestore.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).