From: Brian De Wolf <bldewolf@csupomona.edu>
To: Linux NFS list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Issues using new idmapper in large sites
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:12:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130618201248.6cc88501@csupomona.edu> (raw)
Hello,
I've been having some problems after upgrading to 3.4.44 that seem to
stem from the new idmapper. We've got a site with ~36k users and our
interactive login servers pretty quickly started identifying users as
nfsnobody (-2). Looking at /proc/key-users, we had exhausted the
available space for "keys". After tuning these variables up to large
values, though, it still fails to cache more than ~500 users.
I made a directory with a file owned by every user and started testing
with /proc/sys/kernel/key values. To test, my script
prints /proc/key-users, times an "ls -ln", and checks the output for
wrong uids.
Before tweaking values:
3.4.44-gentoo
0: 620 619/514 615/1000 19995/20000
real 0m52.758s
user 0m0.370s
sys 0m7.020s
Missing users: 35784
0: 620 619/514 615/1000 19995/20000
After tweaking values (and with a hot cache):
3.4.44-gentoo
0: 620 619/514 615/1000000 19995/536870912
real 0m17.198s
user 0m0.410s
sys 0m5.020s
Missing users: 35784
0: 72188 72187/514 72183/1000000 1964565/536870912
It's fast but...it also missed most of my users (it only has 503
cached, there are 36287 total). The refcount and number of keys
skyrocket even further on repeated runs but the number of missing
users remains the same.
After testing with 3.9.6, I'm really wondering about the number of keys
instantiated being so low. It seems to hit the same ~500 limit but does
something so that it can keep working:
3.9.6-gentoo
0: 13 12/12 8/1000000 239/536870912
real 12m3.462s
user 0m0.440s
sys 0m10.720s
Missing users: 0
0: 519 518/518 513/1000000 17276/536870912
The key numbers settle at ~500 and refuse to settle any higher, even on
repeated runs (although if I watch /proc/key-users while it runs, it
sometimes jumps to ~700 and goes back to ~500. Aggressive GC?). It
would be nice to be able to give it a bit more room to cache.
Is there anything else I should test? Is there a tunable I missed? It
looks like idmapping in 3.4.44 is problematic with several hundred
users and slow in 3.9.6. Solaris performs the same test in 1 minute (1
second with a hot cache, though the cache quickly dissipates).
Thanks,
Brian
next reply other threads:[~2013-06-19 3:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-19 3:12 Brian De Wolf [this message]
2013-06-19 13:41 ` Issues using new idmapper in large sites Myklebust, Trond
2013-06-19 14:07 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130618201248.6cc88501@csupomona.edu \
--to=bldewolf@csupomona.edu \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).