* Re: Odp: Re: Performance/stability problems with nfs shares
[not found] <51ff6748611fb6.11394927@wp.pl>
@ 2013-08-05 19:27 ` J. Bruce Fields
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: J. Bruce Fields @ 2013-08-05 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dawid Stawiarski; +Cc: Jeff Layton, linux-nfs
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:50:16AM +0200, Dawid Stawiarski wrote:
> Dnia Piątek, 2 Sierpnia 2013 17:47 J. Bruce Fields napisał(a)
> > On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 04:37:57PM +0200, Dawid Stawiarski wrote:
> > > W dniu 02.08.2013 15:12, Jeff Layton pisze:
> > > >Typically, a stack trace like that indicates that the process is
> > > >waiting for the server to respond. The first thing I would do would be
> > > >to ascertain whether the server is actually responding to these
> > > >requests.
> > > >
> > >
> > > The same share is accessible on other nodes, so the problem involves
> > > only one of the nodes (completly random) at a time.
> >
> > It's still conceivable that a server problem could cause it to stop
> > responding to calls only from a single client--it'd be useful if
> > possible to check a trace to see if that's what's happening. If the
> > traffic is really huge then capturing and analyzing a good trace may be
> > difficult.
>
> I've managed to capture network traffic on client side, when the problem starts.
> It seems like:
> 0. operation SETATTR before problem works as charm (attached for reference)
> 1. retransmission happens very fast after sending 3 packets for WRITE operation
> 1a. linux is not using jumbo frame (3 packets of ~1K size instead of one)
> 2. linux ignores the ACK received after retransmission (actually it's SACK for the third packet)
I don't see any SACK?
But yes I see it appears to be ACKing a sequence number that should
cover the segment the client keeps retransmitting.
And I don't know what would cause that.
Might be worth asking networking folks? (netdev@vger.kernel.org).
--b.
> 3. both client and server start to retransmit their packets
>
> what happens next (not visible in the pcap attached) is that the server sends RST after some time, and client starts new connection - after that, things start to work normally again. So maybe, it's more general problem with TCP stack and not NFS itself?
>
> D.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2013-08-05 19:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <51ff6748611fb6.11394927@wp.pl>
2013-08-05 19:27 ` Odp: Re: Performance/stability problems with nfs shares J. Bruce Fields
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).